Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Economics and Tourism “Dr. Mijo Mirković” , Pula , Croatia .
2. Faculty of Economics and Business , University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia .
Abstract
Abstract
Economic Sentiment Indicator (ESI) became the most popular composite indicator within the EU with the purpose of monitoring and/or forecasting business cycles in one country or for a region as a whole. Since it is calculated regularly, on a monthly base, and is based on five distinct confidence indicators, the main concern is whether the ESI can be explained and/or can explain the current, past or future values of relevant macroeconomic variables. This implies its relevance in predicting both short- and long-term economic outcomes of, for example, variation in income, unemployment fluctuations, consumption change, inflation modifications, sectoral alterations and etc. The question that arises often in academic, as well as within the EU decision-making circles is whether the ESI be used as an explanatory variable with valuable information for modelling the national output developments. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to reveal the true strength and significance in the ESI-GDP nexus for the EU. Empirical research is based on panel cointegration analysis that utilizes data on the ESI and GDP over the period 2000-2018 for the EU28 countries. The causal relationship between the variables appears to be consistent in the short- and long-run across the panel, suggesting that ESI movements do explain movements in national output, hence can help both private and public sector decision-makers to evaluate their goals and plan their actions.
Reference32 articles.
1. Biau, O. and D’Elia, A. (2010). Euro area GDP forecast using large survey datasets. A random forest approach, presented at the 30th Ciret Conference, New York.
2. Breitung, J. (2000). The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. In B. Baltagi (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15: Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Elsevier Science Inc., pp. 161-178.10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15006-6
3. Breitung, J. and Hashem Pesaran, M. (2005). Unit Roots and Cointegration in Panels. CESIFO Working Paper No. 1565, CESifo Group Munich.
4. Choi, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 249-272.10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
5. Di lorio, F. and Fachin, S. (2011). A Panel Cointegration study of the long-run relationship between Savings and Investments in the OECD economies, 1970-2007. Working Paper No. 3, Department of Treasury of the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献