Affiliation:
1. CESSDA ERIC, Bergen , Norway
Abstract
Abstract
Changes in understanding and interpretation of decision-making processes have shed more light on complex interplay given the different settings, and different actors. The limitations in human decision-making and their significance and long-term implications on organizational management or policy making inspired a large body of evidence and research. Exploration of decision-making processes spans over decades, and is closely connected to the role of power; the amount of power in organizations is usually joined by the knowledge and prior experience, which together play a significant role in decision-making process, as well in selection of candidates for the job. However, there is an evident void concerning publications on decision-making processes in academic institutions, and it rapidly becomes the focus of interest due to a specific opposition contained in its core; positions of high level administrators are held by the university professors with no mandatory previous experience and/or knowledge in organisational management.
Reference36 articles.
1. Allison, G.T. (1971). The Essence of Decision. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
2. Baron, J. (2012). The point of normative models in judgment and decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(577), 1-3. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.0057710.3389/fpsyg.2012.00577
3. Beach, R. and al. (2016). A New Theory of Mind: The Theory of Narrative Thought. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
4. Carter, E.E. (1971). The Behavioral Theory of the Firm and Top Level Corporate Decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 412-428.10.2307/2391762
5. Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. (1977). L’acteur et le systeme. Paris, France: Seuil.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Investigating Service Quality Issues in Higher Educational Context;Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business;2019-12-01