Comparison of automatic methods MALDI-TOF, VITEK2 and manual methods for the identification of intestinal microbial communities on the example of samples from alpacas (Vicugna pacos)
Author:
Pławińska-Czarnak Joanna1, Wódz Karolina2, Strzałkowska Zuzanna1, Żychska Monika3, Nowak Tomasz2, Kwieciński Adam2, Kwieciński Piotr2, Bielecki Wojciech4, Rodo Anna4, Rzewuska Magdalena5, Kłosińska Daria6, Anusz Krzysztof1, Orłowska Blanka1
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection , Warsaw , Poland 2. 2 Laboratory of Molecular Biology , Vet-Lab Brudzew , Brudzew , Poland 3. 3 Laboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences , Warsaw , Poland 4. 4 Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences , Warsaw , Poland 5. 5 Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences , Warsaw , Poland 6. 6 Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Morphological Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences , Warsaw , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Universally, in microbiological diagnostics the detection of live bacteria is essential. Rapid identification of pathogens enables appropriate remedial measures to be taken. The identification of many bacteria simultaneously facilitates the determination of the characteristics of the accompanying microbiota and/or the microbiological complexity of a given environment.
Material and Methods
The effectiveness of the VITEK2 Compact automated microbial identification system and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), analytical profile index (API) and Remel RapID tests were compared in identification of bacteria isolated from the alpaca gastrointestinal tract.
Results
Most isolates were Gram-positive, such as Bacillus cereus, Bacillus flexus, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus subtilis; Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus gallinarum, Enterococcus hirae and Enterococcus casseliflavus; Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus equorum, Staphylococcus lentus, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus sciuri; Paenibacillus amylolyticus; Cellulosimicrobium cellulans; Leuconostoc mesenteroides; Clostridium perfringens; Corynebacterium stationis, Corynebacterium xerosis, and Corynebacterium diphtheriae (the last only isolated manually by API Coryne and the VITEK2 system and Corynebacteria (CBC) card). Corynebacterium diphtheriae was misidentified by MALDI-TOF MS as Candida lipolytica (currently Yarrowia lipolytica). Gram-positive and Gram-variable Micrococcus luteus were also isolated. Gram-negative Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter gergoviae, Enterobacter hormaechei and Enterobacter ludwigii; E. coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae; Citrobacter braakii and Citrobacter freundii; Serratia liquefaciens, Serratia odorifera and Serratia marcescens; Morganella morganii subsp. morganii; Providencia alcalifaciens; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Moraxella osloensis; and Ochrobactrum intermedium were also found. The yeasts Candida albicans, Candida haemulonii and Candida ciferrii were also present.
Conclusion
MALDI-TOF MS enabled the identification of pathogens and opportunistic pathogens from the alpaca gut which may represent a high risk to human and animal health.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference30 articles.
1. Aujoulat F., Romano-Bertrand.S., Masnou A., Marchandin H., Jumas-Bilak.E.: Niches, population structure and genome reduction in Ochrobactrum intermedium: Clues to technology-driven emergence of pathogens. PLoS One 2014, 9, e83376, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083376. 2. Burton A.J., Nydam D.V., Mitchell K.J., Bowman D.D.: Fecal shedding of cryptosporidium oocysts in healthy alpaca crias and their dams. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012, 241, 496–498, doi: 10.2460/javma.241.4.496. 3. Carroll C.: The Relationship Between Microbiota, Diet, and Energy Production in the Alpaca. Theses and Dissertations, 6943, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 2017. https://scholarsarchive. byu.edu/etd/6943. 4. Carroll C., Olsen K.D., Ricks N.J., Dill-McFarland.K.A., Suen G., Robinson T.F., Chaston J.M.: Bacterial communities in the alpaca gastrointestinal tract vary with diet and body site. Front Microbiol 2019, 9, 3334, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03334. 5. Chao R., Xia C., Pei C., Huo W., Liu Q., Zhang C., Ren Y.: Comparison of the microbial communities of alpacas and sheep fed diets with three different ratios of corn stalk to concentrate. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2021, 105, 26–34, doi: 10.1111/jpn. 13442.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|