A comparison of four approaches to river landscape delineation: The case of small watercourses in the Czech Republic
Author:
Jakubínský Jiří1, Herber Vladimír2, Cudlín Pavel1
Affiliation:
1. Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences , Brno , Czech Republic 2. Masaryk University , Faculty of Science, Department of Geography , Brno , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
River landscapes represent key areas of great importance to human society as they perform many functions and provide valuable services. Traditionally, these areas have been perceived as geomorphological phenomena characterised by specific soil conditions, hydrological regimes and unique habitats. Due to the availability of detailed data, it is possible to perform a spatial delineation of river landscapes by interpreting these data using several different approaches. The results of these different approaches can vary considerably, since it is particularly challenging to define the river landscape along small watercourses for which the availability of suitable data is limited. The main aim of this study is to analyse the various methodological approaches that may be used to define the river landscapes of small streams, and to evaluate the efficiency of those approaches that can be applied in nature and landscape conservation. Two medium-sized catchments in the Czech Republic were selected as the study areas in order to ensure different natural conditions and degrees of anthropogenic pressure. As a result, an approach based on combining soil characteristics and topographic information is considered the most appropriate solution to delineate the river ecosystem.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference58 articles.
1. ALBER, A., PIÉGAY, H. (2011): Spatial aggregation procedure for characterizing physical structures of fluvial networks: applications to the Rhône basin. Geomorphology, 125(3): 343–360. 2. ALTDORF, D., EPTING, J., KRUK, J. V. D., DIETRICH, P., HUGGENBERGER, P. (2013): Delineation of fluvial sediment architecture of subalpine riverine systems using noninvasive hydrogeophysical methods. Environmental earth sciences, 69(2): 633–644. 3. AMOROS, C., ROUX, A. L. (1988): Interactions between water bodies within the floodplains of large rivers: function and development of connectivity. In: Schreiber, K. F. [ed.]: Connectivity in landscape ecology (pp. 125–130). Muenster, Muensterische Geographische Arbeit. 4. BLAUHUT, V., STAHL, K., STAGGE, J. H., TALLAKSEN, L. M., STEFANO, L. D., VOGT, J. (2016): Estimating drought risk across Europe from reported drought impacts, drought indices, and vulnerability factors. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(7): 2779–2800.10.5194/hess-20-2779-2016 5. CARBONNEAU, P., FONSTAD, M. A., MARCUS, W. A., DUGDALE, S. J. (2012): Making riverscapes real. Geomorphology, 137: 74–86.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|