Affiliation:
1. Victoria University of Wellington
2. Victoria University of Wellington , OK 422, Old Kirk Building, Gate 2, Kelburn Parade , Wellington , , New Zealand
Abstract
Abstract
This article examines the European Union (EU) in light of Benedict Anderson's definition of the nation as “an imagined community … imagined as inherently limited and sovereign.” Current scholarship mostly rejects the possibility of an EU nation, or treats it only as a possible eventuality, not a current reality. Interpreting Andersonian “sovereignty” through the lens of political legitimacy, the EU nevertheless satisfies all four of Anderson's criteria, since members of the EU Parliament invoke a “European people” to legitimize their actions. EU nationhood coexists with other national loyalties. However, multiple national loyalties exist elsewhere in Europe, since British nationhood coexists with Welsh nationhood, German nationhood with Sorbian nationhood, and so on. Eurobarometer evidence also suggests that multiple loyalties are widespread. Treating the EU as a nation offers many analytical advantages, since scholars do not need to struggle with terminological novelties, but can straightforwardly apply the secondary literature on nationalism.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,History,Cultural Studies
Reference109 articles.
1. Alfano, Sonia. 2011. Organised crime in the European Union (short presentation). Debates of the European Parliament, October 24: 95–96.
2. Amery, Julien. 1977. Scotland and Wales Bill. Hansard Parliamentary Debates, UK Parliament, House of Commons. February 16, 926: 539.
3. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
4. Anon. 1806. Titulatur und Wappen Seiner Oesterreichisch-Kaiserlichen und Königlich-Apostolischen Majestät ... vom sechsten August 1806. [Titulature and coat of arms of His Austrian Imperial and Royal Apostlic Majesty ... dated August 6, 1806]. Vienna: K-K Hof- und Staatsdruckerey.
5. Antonsich, Marco. 2008. “The Narration of Europe in ‘National’ and ‘Post-National’ Terms: Gauging the Gap between Normative Discourses and People's Views.” European Journal of Social Theory 11(4): 502–522.