Affiliation:
1. Crimean Federal University , Vernadsky Ave, 4 , Simferopol , Russia
Abstract
Abstract
The article deals with the transformation of the Crimean Tatars’ institutions and discourses after the 2014 conflict around Crimea. It shows the change in the balance of power of traditional institutions such as Mejlis and Muftiyat, which for many years represented secular and religious components of Crimean Tatars’ ethnic identity. It tells how the Mejlis was dismissed from the political stage in Crimea, while the Muftiyat has enjoyed a great support by new authorities. This transformation and threats to societal security inevitably led to reassessment of previous views and goals of the main actors in the Crimean Tatar community and the formation of new institutions with hybrid composition and discourse. The article focuses on organization such as ‘Crimean solidarity,’ which was formed in 2016 as a reaction to authorities’ pressure over the Crimean Tatars. Using discourse analysis of statements of activists of this organization and content analysis of social media, the author presents the main topics of its discourse and types of activity. She shows how the traditional Islamic discourse of activists of this organization has been transformed by the incorporation of the main concepts of secular discourse developed by the Mejlis. The author argues that the appearance of ‘Crimean solidarity’ indicates the blurring of lines between secular and religious, and ethnic and Islamic in the Crimean Tatar society. It shows how people with different backgrounds and agendas manage to leave their differences aside to support each other in the face of a common threat.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Sociology and Political Science,History,Cultural Studies
Reference44 articles.
1. Allworth, Edward, ed. 1998. The Tatars of Crimea: Return to the Homeland – Studies and Documents Durham and London: Duke University Press.
2. Aydın, Filiz Tutku. 2014. “Crimean Tatars and Russia’s Annexation of Crimea.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 13 (3): 81-92.
3. Bassi, Andrea. 2014. “Book Review. Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector: Challenges for Practice, Theory and Policy, David Billis.” De Gruyter. Nonprofit Policy Forum 5(2): 395–401.
4. Belitser, Natalya. 2016. Kryms’ ki tatary yak korinnyi narod: istoriia pytannia i suchasni realii [The Crimean Tatars as indigenous people: the history of the question and contemporary realities] Kyiv: Ministry of Information Policy.
5. Billis, David. 2010. “Towards a theory of hybrid organizations.” In Hybrid organizations and the third sector: challenges for practice, theory and policy edited by David Billis, 46-69. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Compliant Subjects?;Communist and Post-Communist Studies;2022-03-01
2. Gender roles and Muslim women’s activism in post-2014 Crimea;Religion, State and Society;2022-01-01
3. Looking East, Looking West;Russian Exceptionalism between East and West;2021