Setting the Bar Low: Are Websites Complying With the Minimum Requirements of the CCPA?

Author:

Van Nortwick Maggie1,Wilson Christo1

Affiliation:

1. Northeastern University

Abstract

Abstract On June 28, 2018, the California State Legislature passed the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), arguably the most comprehensive piece of online privacy legislation in the United States. Online services covered by the CCPA are required to provide a hyperlink on their homepage with the text “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” (DNSMPI). The CCPA went into effect on January 1, 2020, a date that was chosen to give data collectors time to study the new law and bring themselves into compliance. In this study, we begin the process of investigating whether websites are complying with the CCPA by focusing on DNSMPI links. Using longitudinal data crawled from the top 1M websites in the Tranco ranking, we examine which websites are including DNSMPI links, whether the websites without DNSMPI links are out of compliance with the law, whether websites are using geofences to dynamically hide DNSMPI links from non-Californians, how DNSMPI adoption has changed over time, and how websites are choosing to present DNSMPI links (e.g., in terms of font size, color, and placement). We argue that the answers to these questions are critical for spurring enforcement actions under the law, and helping to shape future privacy laws and regulations, e.g., rule making that will soon commence around the successor to the CCPA, known as the CPRA.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference79 articles.

1. [1] Accessibility Guidelines Working Group. Understanding success criterion 1.4.3: Contrast (minimum). World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), 2021. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/contrast-minimum.html.

2. [2] Idris Adjerid, Alessandro Acquisti, Laura Brandimarte, and George F. Loewenstein. Sleights of privacy: framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency. In Proc. of the Workshop on Usable Security, 2013.10.1145/2501604.2501613

3. [3] Fatemeh Alizadeh, Timo Jakobi, Alexander Boden, Gunnar Stevens, and Jens Boldt. GDPR Reality Check – Claiming and Investigating Personally Identifiable Data from Companies. In Proc. of EuroS&PW, 2020.10.1109/EuroSPW51379.2020.00025

4. [4] Ryan Amos, Gunes Acar, Elena Lucherini, Mihir Kshirsagar, Arvind Narayanan, and Jonathan Mayer. Privacy policies over time: Curation and analysis of a million-document dataset. In Proc. of WWW, 2021.10.1145/3442381.3450048

5. [5] Benjamin Andow, Samin Yaseer Mahmud, Wenyu Wang, Justin Whitaker, William Enck, Bradley Reaves, Kapil Singh, and Tao Xie. Policylint: Investigating internal privacy policy contradictions on google play. In Proc. of USENIX Security Symposium, 2019.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3