Website Fingerprinting in the Age of QUIC

Author:

Smith Jean-Pierre1,Mittal Prateek2,Perrig Adrian1

Affiliation:

1. ETH Zurich

2. Princeton University

Abstract

Abstract With the meteoric rise of the QUIC protocol, the supremacy of TCP as the de facto transport protocol underlying web traffic will soon cease. HTTP/3, the next version of the HTTP protocol, will not support TCP. Current website-fingerprinting literature has ignored the introduction of this new protocol to all modern browsers. In this work, we investigate whether classifiers trained in the TCP setting generalise to QUIC traces, whether QUIC is inherently more difficult to fingerprint than TCP, how feature importance changes between these protocols, and how to jointly classify QUIC and TCP traces. Experiments using four state-of-theart website-fingerprinting classifiers and our combined QUIC-TCP dataset of ~117,000 traces show that while QUIC is not inherently more difficult to fingerprint than TCP, TCP-trained classifiers may fail to detect up to 96% of QUIC visits to monitored URLs. Furthermore, classifiers that take advantage of the common information between QUIC and TCP traces for the same URL may outperform ensembles of protocol-specific classifiers in limited data settings.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference67 articles.

1. [1] Roger Dingledine, Nick Mathewson, and Paul Syverson. Tor: The second-generation onion router. In Proceedings of the 13thConference on USENIX Security Symposium - Volume 13, SSYM’04, page 21, USA, 2004. USENIX Association.

2. [2] D. Das, S. Meiser, E. Mohammadi, and A. Kate. Anonymity trilemma: Strong anonymity, low bandwidth overhead, low latency - choose two. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 108–126, May 2018. 10.1109/SP.2018.00011.

3. [3] Tao Wang, Xiang Cai, Rishab Nithyanand, Rob Johnson, and Ian Goldberg. Effective attacks and provable defenses for website fingerprinting. In 23rdUSENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 14), pages 143–157, San Diego, CA, August 2014. USENIX Association. ISBN 978-1-931971-15-7. URL https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity14/technical-sessions/presentation/wang_tao.

4. [4] Andriy Panchenko, Fabian Lanze, Jan Pennekamp, Thomas Engel, Andreas Zinnen, Martin Henze, and Klaus Wehrle. Website fingerprinting at internet scale. In 23rdAnnual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, NDSS 2016, San Diego, California, USA, February 21-24, 2016. The Internet Society, 2016. URL https://nymity.ch/tordns/pdf/Panchenko2016a.pdf.

5. [5] Jamie Hayes and George Danezis. k-fingerprinting: A robust scalable website fingerprinting technique. In 25th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 16), pages 1187–1203, Austin, TX, August 2016. USENIX Association. ISBN 978-1-931971-32-4. URL https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity16/technical-sessions/presentation/hayes.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. QUIC website fingerprinting based on automated machine learning;ICT Express;2023-12

2. Lightweight and Effective Website Fingerprinting Over Encrypted DNS;2023 Silicon Valley Cybersecurity Conference (SVCC);2023-05-17

3. Optimization Design and Implementation of Web Fingerprint Identification;2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT);2023-04-08

4. A hands-on gaze on HTTP/3 security through the lens of HTTP/2 and a public dataset;Computers & Security;2023-02

5. Characterizing Privacy Leakage in Encrypted DNS Traffic;IEICE Transactions on Communications;2023-02-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3