Emotional and Practical Considerations Towards the Adoption and Abandonment of VPNs as a Privacy-Enhancing Technology

Author:

Namara Moses1,Wilkinson Daricia1,Caine Kelly1,Knijnenburg Bart P.1

Affiliation:

1. Clemson University

Abstract

Abstract Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) can help people protect their privacy. Despite this, VPNs are not widely used among the public. In this survey study about the adoption and usage of VPNs, we investigate people’s motivation to use VPNs and the barriers they encounter in adopting them. Using data from 90 technologically savvy participants, we find that while nearly all (98%; 88) of the participants have knowledge about what VPNs are, less than half (42%; 37) have ever used VPNs primarily as a privacy-enhancing technology. Of these, 18% (7) abandoned using VPNs while 81% (30) continue to use them to protect their privacy online. In a qualitative analysis of survey responses, we find that people who adopt and continue to use VPNs for privacy purposes are primarily motivated by emotional considerations, including the strong desire to protect their privacy online, wide fear of surveillance and data tracking not only from Internet service providers (ISPs) but also governments and Internet corporations such as Facebook and Google. In contrast, people who are mainly motivated by practical considerations are more likely to abandon VPNs, especially once their practical need no longer exists. These people cite their access to alternative technologies and the effort required to use a VPN as reasons for abandonment. We discuss implications of these findings and provide suggestions on how to maximize adoption of privacy-enhancing technologies such as VPNs, focusing on how to align them with people’s interests and privacy risk evaluation.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. [1] J. Penney, “Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: a comparative case study,” 2017.

2. [2] F. Schaub, “The implications of the fcc’s net neutrality repeal,” Media and Communication, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 69–72, 2018.

3. [3] J. Gillula, “Five creepy things your isp could do if congress repeals the fcc’s privacy protections,” Mar 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/03/five-creepy-things-your-isp-could-do-if-congress-repeals-fccs-privacy-protections

4. [4] A. Kalia, “Here’s how to protect your privacy from your internet service provider,” 3rd Apr 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/04/heres-how-protect-your-privacy-your-internet-service-provider

5. [5] P. Ferguson and G. Huston, “What is a vpn?” Tech. Rep., 1st June 1998. [Online]. Available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/press/internet-protocol-journal/back-issues/table-contents-18/what-is-a-vpn.html

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3