Modern ideas about the object of scientific knowledge and bioethics

Author:

Chursinova Oksana1ORCID,Petrushenko Viktor2ORCID,Petrushenko Oksana3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lviv Polytechnic National University ( Ukraine )

2. Lviv Orthodox Theology Academy ( Ukraine )

3. Lviv Medical Institute ( Ukraine )

Abstract

Abstract The present article analyzes and outlines significant changes in ideas about the object of scientific knowledge in modern science. Special attention is paid to the transition to the paradigm of complexity, within which the object of scientific knowledge acquires a complex systemic character and remains in the same complex connections with systems of different levels. It is marked that such changes entail a number of methodological requirements, which are especially clearly manifested in modern theories of bioethics and its real practices. A special role in this case is assigned to issues of transdisciplinary approach, complementary methodology, and values of the subject of bioethical cognition. The prospects for further research are related to the possibilities of deepening the methodology of the paradigm of complexity based on the application of a transdisciplinary approach.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Education

Reference27 articles.

1. ARGAMAKOVA, A. (2017): Sociogumanitarnoe izmerenie tehnonauki [Social and humanitarian dimensions of technoscience]. In: Èpistemologija i filosofija nauki, 52(2), pp. 120–136.10.5840/eps201752234

2. ARSHINOV, V. (2012): Postneklassičeskie praktiki: opyt konceptualizacii [Post-non-classical practices: Experience of conceptualization]. Moscow: Izdateľstvo Mir.

3. BOHATA, L. (2013): Problematizacija temy myšlenija [Problematization of the topic of thinking]. In: L. Bohata (ed.): Filosofija myšlenija [Philosophy of thought]. Odessa: Pečatnyj dom, pp. 163–195.

4. CHILDRESS, J. F. (2007): Methods in bioethics. In: B. Steinbock (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–45.

5. DRAPER, H. (2019): Activism, bioethics and academic research. In: Bioethics, 33(8), pp. 861–871.10.1111/bioe.12574

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Building the bioethics tools of a community council to the future: the ecosystemic gap;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2023-09-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3