Affiliation:
1. 1 University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava ( Slovakia )
Abstract
Abstract
Some determinist approaches to free will opine that the human brain is subordinate to physical laws not fully under our control. This results in a weakening of the concept of the personal autonomy and moral responsibility of humans. Were we to acknowledge this assumption, we might consider automatic machines unable to influence the thoughts and intentions from which our actions take root. The key issue lies in the fact that an individual does not consciously engage in particular actions (automatisms), which challenges the concept of free will in an individual’s complex behaviour. Despite this issue, not all automatisms that lack conscious will can be viewed as lacking free will. The paper examines whether classical philosophical concepts may weaken the strict determinist approach, which seeks to deny that individuals have free will due to the existence of automatic actions.
Subject
Health Policy,Philosophy,Education
Reference39 articles.
1. ARISTOTLE (1924): Metaphysics, trans. & ed. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. ARISTOTLE (1999): Nicomachean ethics, trans. & ed. W. D. Ross. Ontario: Batoche Books.
3. BALABAN, O. (1990): Praxis and Poesis in Aristotle’s practical philosophy. In: The Journal of Value Inquiry, 24(3), pp. 185–198.
4. BAUMEISTER, R. F. & TIERNEY, J. (2011): Willpower redescovering the greatest human strength. New York: The Penguin Press.
5. BERAN, R. G. (2019): Automatism: A case of reality testing. In: Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, 1, pp. 1–6.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献