Mapping perceptions of topophilia and topophobia using a mobile app: A tale of two cities

Author:

Brisudová Lucia1ORCID,Chataway Michael2ORCID,Moir Emily3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography, Faculty of Science , Palacký University Olomouc , Czech Republic

2. School of Justice , Queensland University of Technology , Australia

3. School of Law and Society , University of the Sunshine Coast , Australia

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates positive (topophilic) and negative (topophobic) perceptions of places using participatory mapping methods. Current research on mapping perceptions of urban environments relies heavily on retrospective self-reports from citizens. These methods are often susceptible to recall bias and do not capture granular information about urban environments. Places are dynamic, and peoples’ perceptions of them vary by time and space. To address these gaps in methods, we collected data from individuals living in two cities, Olomouc, Czech Republic and Brisbane, Australia. GIS was used to analyse a combined total of 634 momentary assessments from Olomouc, and 318 assessments from Brisbane. Our findings suggest that this approach can yield accurate and reliable data about perceptions of topophobia and topophilia in the two cities as well as enable researchers to clearly define hotspots and hot times related to individual activity spaces.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference50 articles.

1. ABS. Brisbane: 2021 Census All persons QuickStats. Australian Bureau of Statistics. https://abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/SAL32645

2. Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space, and Society, 2, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005

3. Bowring, J. (2013). Topophilia and topophobia in the post-earthquake landscape of Christchurch, New Zealand. Revista Geografica del Sur, 4(6), 103–122. https://hdl.handle.net/10182/7252

4. Brisudová, L., Huck, J., & Solymosi, R. (2022). Does real time experience matter? Comparison of retrospective and in situ spatial data in participatory mapping. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Geographical Information Science Research UK (GISRUK) Conference: Liverpool, United Kingdom. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/does-real-time-experience-matter-comparison-of-retrospective-and-

5. Brisudová, L., & Klapka, P. (2023). “It should be treated in a better way”: Perceived topovacancy in the participative urban planning. Cities, 141, 104505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104505

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3