Monitoring of Reproduction Activity on Algerian Dairy Cattle Farms
Author:
Ferag Aziza12, Gherissi Djalel Eddine13, Bordja Nadjat1, Boughanem Amel4, Moussa Hafida Hadj4, Khenenou Tarek12
Affiliation:
1. 1 Institute of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences 2. 3 Laboratory of Sciences and Techniques for Living University of Souk-Ahras 3. 2 Laboratory of Animal Production, Biotechnologies, and Health 4. 4 National Centre for Artificial Insemination and Genetic Improvement (CNIAAG) , Birtouta , Algeria
Abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the reproductive monitoring activity in Algerian dairy cattle herds. A participatory survey was conducted with 75 veterinarians and inseminators affiliated with the National Centre for Artificial Insemination and Genetic Improvement (CNIAAG). Reproduction monitoring represents a primary activity for 12 % of the veterinarians. Only 10.8 % of veterinarians earn more than 50 % of the yearly global revenue from reproductive activities. 85.3 % of the veterinarians fix the herd monitoring objectives, 64 % use a paper notebook to manage breeding data, and only 22 % establish a reproduction statute inventory. The most requested information before the visit is the last mating (80 %), oestrus (80 %), and calving (90.7 %) dates. Monthly routine fertility visits were practiced by 32 % of the interviewed veterinarians, and only about half of them (52 %) checked the cows systematically at post-partum. The pregnancy diagnosis is practiced by 72 % of veterinarians at 56.71 ± 22.82 days postpartum and confirmed at 91.85 ± 26.94 days postpartum. Furthermore, 73 % of the respondents systematically examined non-pregnant cows after 3 matings; however, only 48 % simultaneously recorded the cows’ body condition score. Regarding postpartum genital pathology control 38.7 %, 22.7 %, and 26.7 % of veterinarians always perform manual transrectal exploration of the genital tract, vaginoscopy, and ultrasonography, respectively. While, 73 % of them examine the cows’ cyclicity when evaluating uterine involution. A substantial proportion of veterinarians included monitoring feed, milk quality/mammary disease, and livestock diseases, in their regular visits. The dairy farmers must be advised of the economic benefits of routine fertility monitoring to achieve good herd reproductive traits.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference48 articles.
1. 1. Abraham, B., 2017: An overview on functional causes of infertility in cows. JFIV Reprod. Med. Genet., 5, 2‒203. DOI: 10.4172/2375‒4508.1000203. 2. 2. Achemaoui, A., Bendahmane, M., 2016: Analyse des paramètres de reproduction dans un élevage privée à vocation Bovins laitiers au niveau de la wilaya de Sidi Bel Abbés. Nat. Technol. B‒Sci. Agron. Biol., 14, 20‒22. Available at https://www.univchlef.dz/Revuenatec/issue14/Article_B/Article355.pdf. 3. 3. Arcangioli, M. A., Mounier, L., de Oliveira, L. A., Otz, P., Noordhuizen, J. P., 2009: Approche méthodologique de la visite d’élevage. Point Vétérinaire, 40, 9‒14. Available at 〈hal-02656209〉. 4. 4. Ballou, M. A., 2012: Growth and development symposium. Inflammation: Role in the aetiology and pathophysiology of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci., 90, 5, 1466–1478. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011‒4663. 5. 5. Bedere, N., Cutullic, E., Delaby, L., Garcia-Launay, F., Disenhaus, C., 2018: Meta-analysis of the relationships between reproduction, milk yield and body condition score in dairy cows. Livestock Sci., 210, 73‒84. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.01.017.
|
|