Participatory Planning in Post-socialist Cities: A Case Study of Riga-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Participatory Planning in Post-socialist Cities: A Case Study of Riga

Published:2020-01-01 Issue:1 Volume:16 Page:17-25
ISSN:2255-8764
Container-title:Architecture and Urban Planning
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Akmentiņa Lita¹

Affiliation:

1. Riga Technical University , Riga , Latvia

Abstract

Abstract After three decades of socio-economic and political changes, participation in urban planning is still an emerging practice in post-socialist countries. Using Riga as a case study, the research aims to explore participatory planning practices in a post-socialist urban context since 1990. Employing meta-analysis as a methodological approach to combine information from various sources, the study identifies three phases of participatory planning in Riga characterized by changes in government-led participatory planning approaches, level of participation, outcomes as well as changes in the civic sector.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,History,Architecture,Geography, Planning and Development,Conservation

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/aup-2020-0004

Reference40 articles.

1. 1. Huxley, M. Historicizing Planning, Problematizing Participation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 37, Issue 5, 2013, pp. 1527–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12045

2. 2. McTague, C., Jakubowski, S. Marching to the beat of a silent drum: Wasted consensus-building and failed neighborhood participatory planning. Applied Geography, Vol. 44, 2013, pp. 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.019

3. 3. Brannan, T., John, P., Stoker, G. Active Citizenship and Effective Public Services and Programmes: How Can We Know What Really Works? Urban Studies, Vol. 43, Issue 5–6, 2006, pp. 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600676626

4. 4. Aitken, M., Haggett, C., Rudolph, D. Practices and rationales of community engagement with wind farms: awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 17, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1218919

5. 5. Anggraeni, M., Gupta, J., Verrest, H. J. L. M. Cost and value of stake-holders participation: A systematic literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 101, 2019, pp. 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.012

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Overcoming the limitations to co-production in shrinking cities: insights from Latvia, France, and the Netherlands;European Planning Studies;2023-05-04

2. A Bourdieusian Framework for Understanding Public Space Heritage Transformations: Riga’s Castle Square;Urban Planning;2023-01-13

3. University-Community Engagement: Formation of New Collaboration Patterns in Participatory Budgeting Process;Architecture and Urban Planning;2022-01-01

4. Participatory Urban Improvement and Gender. Lessons from Jordan Refugee Camps;Architecture and Urban Planning;2022-01-01

5. FACILITATING PARTICIPATORY ADVANCEMENT IN ARCHITECTURE USING EXTENDED REALITY SOLUTIONS. THE LITERATURE ANALYSIS;Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis;2021-05-25