Decentralised Technology and Technology Neutrality in Legal Rules: An Analysis of De Voogd and Hedqvist

Author:

Veerpalu Anne1

Affiliation:

1. Doctoral Candidate in Informational Technology Law University of Tartu , School of Law ( Estonia )

Abstract

Abstract This article looks at whether the principle of technology neutrality can be applied to the centralised-decentralised scale in a manner similar to its application to the offline-online scale. The analysis is based on two cases of similar circumstances relating to bitcoin exchanges run by early adopters in Estonia and Sweden. The cases exhibit two different ex ante legislative approaches aimed at payments in currencies and the interpretation of the respective legislation by the judiciary in applying these rules to bitcoins and to the activity of exchanging bitcoins. The article examines whether the legal rules applied to the payment infrastructure of currencies were technology neutral and also implemented neutrally or whether, contrary to the principle, there was difference of treatment of decentralised technology outputs – bitcoins – from the centralised technology outputs – legal tender – irrelevant of the functional equivalence of these units of payment.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference65 articles.

1. 1. Anderlini, Luca, Leonardo Felli, and Alessandro Riboni. “Statute Law or Case Law?” LSE STICERD Research Paper No. TE/2008/528 (August 2008) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1401783.

2. 2. Antonopoulos, Andreas M. Handbook of Digital Currencies: Bitcoin, Innovation, Financial instruments, and Big Data (Elsevier, 2015).

3. 3. Antonopoulos, Andreas M. Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies (O’Reilly, 2014).

4. 4. Bennett Moses, Lyria. “Understanding legal responses to technological change: the example of in vitro fertilization.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology Volume 6, Issue 2 (2005) // https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1337&context=mjlst.

5. 5. Butenko, Anna, and Pierre Larouche. “Regulation for innovativeness or regulation of innovation?” Law, Innovation and Technology 7:1 (2015): 52–82 // DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2015.1052643.10.1080/17579961.2015.1052643

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Shareholder Ledger Using Distributed Ledger Technology: The Estonian Perspective;Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology;2019-09-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3