Affiliation:
1. Uppsala University
2. Postdoctoral Fellow, Södertörn University
Abstract
Abstract
Clubhouse is a social network allowing only real-time oral communication. While its 2020 worldwide launch went largely unnoticed in Eastern Europe, it took countries such as Ukraine and Russia by storm in February 2021. Users were enticed by the platform’s exclusivity (invitation only and limited to IOS users), unusual format, and compatibility with post-covid social life. For some time, Clubhouse was the dominant theme of discussions on other social media, mainstream news media organizations started launching daily talk shows in the app, and early adopters engaged in a plethora of participatory activities ranging from propagandist broadcasts to 24/7 rooms where bots would recite Russian classical poetry, from fervently seeking ways to monetise their participation to creating the somewhat unexpected genre of audial fakes.
In this article we intend to analyse the turbulent arrival of the new app in Russia and Ukraine from the perspectives of media ecology and media archaeology. Focusing on the app’s mediality and remediation, the social media discourse about it and particular content in some of the notable rooms, we highlight the conjunction of social environment, the already existing and novel technological affordances, as well as users’ perceptions and expectations in the emergence of a new niche in the ecology of participatory media. Based on this, we will also try to outline some possible scenarios for the new platform in Eastern Europe’s dense mediascapes. We argue that the prompt rise of Clubhouse’s popularity was not thanks to its special authenticity, as some suggest, but rather because of the normalization of group long-distance conversations (e.g., via Zoom), coupled with the intentional monomedia poverty of affordances and clearly delimited boundary between the roles of broadcasters and listeners, which was perceived as liberating in a produsage-saturated environment. This actually limits the participatory media potential of content creators and influencers, increasing their power and reviving monological models of communication that suggest a passive audience.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference52 articles.
1. BBC 19 February 2021. ‘Clubhouse Downloads Double in Two Weeks, Analytics Firm Says’. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56127226 (25 June 2021).
2. BBC 24 February 2021. ‘Clubhouse: What Is It and How Do You Get Invited?’ https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56180581 (25 June 2021).
3. Bick, Alexander; Blandin, Adam; Mertens, Karel 2020. ‘Work from Home after the Covid-19 Outbreak’. – CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP15000.10.24149/wp2017
4. Bolter, Jay David; Grusin, Richard 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press. Bruns, Axel 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
5. Bruns, Axel; Schmidt, Jan-Hinrik 2011. ‘Produsage: a closer look at continuing developments’. – New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17, 1, 3–7.10.1080/13614568.2011.563626
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献