Improving the assessment of the diversification of construction companies

Author:

Ginevičius Romualdas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1 Mykolas Romeris University , Lithuania

Abstract

Abstract Various indicators are used to determine the level of company diversification. Their adequacy largely depends on the structure of the production programme. Its essential feature is the comparative weight of the main product in the total scope of the company’s work. In this situation, the intensity of the diversification process is reflected by the decrease in the volume of this product due to the inclusion of new products in the production programme. In this case, the adequacy of the diversification indicator can be reflected by comparing the scale of the main product with changes in the value of these indicators. The adequacy will be higher with more changes in the values of diversification indicators corresponding to changes in the volumes of the main product. Four indicators of corporate diversification are the most well-known and widely used: the Berry index, the entropy measure, Utton’s measure and the DG index. All of them have both strong and weak sides, so it is important to determine situations of the company’s production programme in which diversification indicators are appropriate to use, i.e., in which situations their adequacy is the greatest. The research has established that if the comparative weight of the main product of the production programme in the total scope of work is greater than 0.5, then the adequacy of the entropy measure and index DG is higher compared to the Berry index and Utton’s measure. If it is lower than 0.5, the other two diversification indicators should be used. The obtained results will help to more efficiently manage the process of diversification as a company’s development strategy.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Management Information Systems

Reference55 articles.

1. Aivazian, V. A., Rahaman, M. M., & Zhou, S. (2019). Does corporate diversification provide insurance against economic disruptions? Journal of Business Research, 100(C), 218-233. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.044

2. Ansoff, H. (1957). Strategies for Diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 111-125.

3. Ansoff, H. (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Comp.

4. Arbeitskreis. (1973). Diversifizierung. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 25, 294-335.

5. Atanasova, Ch., & Li, M. (2019). Do all diversified firms hold less cash? The role of product market competition. Journal of International Financial Markets, 59(C), 134-152. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2018.11.005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3