Affiliation:
1. Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun
Abstract
Abstract
The present paper takes on the question of whether the doctrine of unjust enrichment is compatible with libertarianism. Despite Walter Block’s recent arguments to the contrary, the paper argues that unless a gain is received in accordance with the libertarian principles of justice, it is without a basis and thus unjust. This fact alone proves that the concept of unjust enrichment is compatible with libertarianism. Besides, even though it is true — as Block claims — that forcing the recipient of an unjust gain to return it or pay for it involves positive duties and is therefore incompatible with libertarianism, the present paper argues that the practical consequences of this fact would be negligible, for compensatory schemes would develop on the free market anyway in justice-preserving steps.
Reference39 articles.
1. Barker, Melissa A. (1983), “The Doctrines of Specification and Accession: Potential Bases for Legal Ownership through Labor?,” Economic and Industrial Democracy, 4(1), 1–17.10.1177/0143831X8300400102
2. Birks, Peter (2005), Unjust Enrichment, Oxford University Press, New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276981.001.0001
3. Block, Walter E. (2018a), Defending the Undefendable, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.
4. Block, Walter E. (2018b), Defending the Undefendable II, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Ala.
5. Block, Walter E. (2016), “Forestalling, Positive Obligations and the Lockean and Blockian Provisos: Rejoinder to Stephan Kinsella,” Ekonomia–Wroclaw Economic Review, 22(3), 27–41.10.19195/2084-4093.22.3.2
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献