Issues and challenges in compiling a corpus of Early Modern English plays for comparison with those of William Shakespeare

Author:

Demmen Jane1

Affiliation:

1. Lancaster University

Abstract

Abstract In this article I discuss the issues and challenges of compiling a corpus of historical plays by a range of playwrights that is highly suitable for use in comparative, corpus-based research into language style in Shakespeare’s plays. In discussing sources for digitised historical play-texts and criteria for making a selection for the present study, I argue that not just any set of Early Modern English plays constitutes a suitable basis upon which to make reliable claims about language style in Shakespeare’s plays relative to those of his peers. I point out factors outside of authorial choice which potentially have bearing on language style, such as sub-genre features and change over time. I also highlight some particular difficulties in compiling a corpus of historical texts, notably dating and spelling variation, and I explain how these were addressed. The corpus detailed in this article extends the prospects for investigating Shakespeare’s language style by providing a context into which it can be set and, as I indicate, is a valuable new publicly accessible resource for future research.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference69 articles.

1. Archer, Dawn and Derek Bousfield. 2010. ‘See better, Lear’? See Lear better! A corpus-based pragma-stylistic investigation of Shakespeare’s King Lear. In D. McIntyre and B. Busse (eds.). Language and style, 183–203. Basing-toke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-06574-2_12

2. Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper. 2003. Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson and A.M. McEnery (eds.). Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 37–58. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

3. Archer, Dawn, Jonathan Culpeper and Paul Rayson. 2009. Love – ‘a familiar or a devil’? An exploration of key domains in Shakespeare’s comedies and tragedies. In D. Archer (ed.). What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction, 137–157. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.

4. Archer, Dawn and Mathew Gillings. In preparation. Depictions of deception, focussing on five Shakespearean characters.

5. Archer, Dawn, Merja Kytö, Alistair Baron and Paul Rayson. 2015. Guidelines for normalising Early Modern English corpora: Decisions and justifications. ICAME Journal 39 (1): 5–24.10.1515/icame-2015-0001

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Supporting the corpus-based study of Shakespeare’s language: Enhancing a corpus of the First Folio;ICAME Journal;2021-05-01

2. A survey of grammatical variability in Early Modern English drama;Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics;2020-08

3. Mapping the links between gender, status and genre in Shakespeare’s plays;Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics;2020-08

4. Depictions of deception: A corpus-based analysis of five Shakespearean characters;Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics;2020-08

5. Shakespeare’s language: Styles and meanings via the computer;Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics;2020-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3