Affiliation:
1. 1 University of Oviedo
2. 2 University of Vigo
Abstract
AbstractLegal discourse is widely assumed to be resistant to change, and indeed legislative documents are extremely conservative with fixed and formulaic structures. However, recent research has shown that changes can be observed in the lexico-grammatical features of some legal documents when examined diachronically, particularly since the emergence in the 1970s of the Plain Language Movement, which sought to draw attention to the unnecessary complexity of the official language, this including legal discourse. Despite the crucial changes in legal language in recent years, research in that direction is scarce to date, particularly in the British English variety, probably due, in part, to the shortage of specialised corpora that allow this kind of studies. In order to bridge this gap, we have embarked on the compilation of theCorpus of Contemporary English Legal Decisions, 1950–2021(CoCELD), a corpus of British judicial decisions produced between 1950 and 2021. In this paper we present the structure and characteristics of CoCELD, as well as the methodology used for its compilation. The new corpus, which was released in February 2022, contains sample texts of roughly 2,500 words for each year from 1950 to 2021, which adds up to more than 730,000 words. The corpus contains files in raw text and with POS-annotation, and is freely available for the research community under signed consent. With CoCELD we hope to contribute with a new, useful resource for linguists with an interest in legal language, from both a synchronic and a diachronic perspective.
Reference50 articles.
1. ARCHER = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers version X. 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013/2016. Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Bamberg, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Lancaster, Leicester, Manchester, Michigan, Northern Arizona, Santiago de Compostela, Southern California, Trier, Uppsala, Zurich.
2. Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Biber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 2019. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41 (2):103–134.
5. Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2019. Are law reports an “agile” or an “uptight” register? Tracking patterns of historical change in the use of colloquial and complexity features. In T. Fanego and P. Rodríguez-Puente (eds.). Corpus-based research on variation in English legal discourse, 149–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.