Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Antigypsyism in Slovakia: A Social Psychology Perspective

Author:

Hargašová Lucia1ORCID,Lášticová Barbara1ORCID,Poslon Xenia Daniela1,Belán Dóra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ústav vý -skumu sociálnej komunikácie SAV , Dúbravská cesta 9, 841 04 Bratislava

Abstract

Abstract Despite numerous efforts of Roma inclusion from various State and non-governmental organisations, segregation and socioeconomic marginalisation of the Roma is still widespread in Slovakia. In this paper, we show what social-psychological factors intervene into the process of intergroup relations change and how they can influence the effectiveness of interventions to reduce antigypsyism. We contend that establishing intergroup harmony between majority and minority may, by creating false assumptions about the absence of structural inequalities, weaken the potential for social change and minority collective action. Based on the theoretical analysis as well as the content analysis of anti-discrimination interventions carried out in the year 2018 and the thematic analysis of interviews with selected stakeholders (NGO representatives, intervention participants, sponsors) we identified four challenges that need to be tackled if the interventions are to succeed in reducing antigypsyism. These are: 1) essentializing vs. empowerment of minorities; 2) tension between the colourblind and multiculturalism approaches; 3) problem of intergroup boundaries and their consequences for generalization of positive intergroup attitudes to the whole outgroup; and 4) societal norms defining the nature of intergroup relations. We discuss how these challenges ought to be addressed in succesful anti-discrimination interventions.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Anthropology

Reference87 articles.

1. Adams, G. (2012). Context in person, person in context: A cultural psychology approach to social-personality psychology. In: K. Deaux, M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (s. 182–208).

2. Alliance against Antigypsyism (2017). Antigypsyism – a reference paper. získané z https://abv.a52.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Antigypsyism-reference-paper-16.06.2017.pdf.

3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

4. Barry, B. (2001). Culture and equality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

5. Barth, F. (1969/1998). Ethnic groups and boundaries. The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3