Affiliation:
1. Ústav vý -skumu sociálnej komunikácie SAV , Dúbravská cesta 9, 841 04 Bratislava
Abstract
Abstract
Despite numerous efforts of Roma inclusion from various State and non-governmental organisations, segregation and socioeconomic marginalisation of the Roma is still widespread in Slovakia. In this paper, we show what social-psychological factors intervene into the process of intergroup relations change and how they can influence the effectiveness of interventions to reduce antigypsyism. We contend that establishing intergroup harmony between majority and minority may, by creating false assumptions about the absence of structural inequalities, weaken the potential for social change and minority collective action. Based on the theoretical analysis as well as the content analysis of anti-discrimination interventions carried out in the year 2018 and the thematic analysis of interviews with selected stakeholders (NGO representatives, intervention participants, sponsors) we identified four challenges that need to be tackled if the interventions are to succeed in reducing antigypsyism. These are: 1) essentializing vs. empowerment of minorities; 2) tension between the colourblind and multiculturalism approaches; 3) problem of intergroup boundaries and their consequences for generalization of positive intergroup attitudes to the whole outgroup; and 4) societal norms defining the nature of intergroup relations. We discuss how these challenges ought to be addressed in succesful anti-discrimination interventions.
Reference87 articles.
1. Adams, G. (2012). Context in person, person in context: A cultural psychology approach to social-personality psychology. In: K. Deaux, M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (s. 182–208).
2. Alliance against Antigypsyism (2017). Antigypsyism – a reference paper. získané z https://abv.a52.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Antigypsyism-reference-paper-16.06.2017.pdf.
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Barry, B. (2001). Culture and equality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5. Barth, F. (1969/1998). Ethnic groups and boundaries. The social organization of culture difference. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献