The EU’s Digital Markets Act: Regulatory Reform, Relapse or Reversal?

Author:

Boscheck Ralf1

Affiliation:

1. International Institute for Management Development , Lausanne , Switzerland .

Abstract

Abstract As of 7 March 2024, the EU Commission began to enforce its controversial Digital Markets Act (DMA). This article sheds light on the recent debate. It lists the dos and don’ts of the DMA as well as stakeholder reactions to them before tracing some of the underlying motivations and reasoning that emerge from the EU’s current policy reversal with reference to dealing with abuse of dominant positions in line with Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Following this, the paper reviews economic aspects of digital platforms, concerns about market foreclosure and essential facility as well as appropriate remedies before closing with a discussion of the challenges in stipulating and enforcing efficient rules to govern digital platforms. It is argued that the DMA ought to be rewritten to stipulate clear and cogent legal standards, return to a strengthened system of ex post control and provide platforms with the opportunity to deliver efficiency defenses as part of corporate self-regulation.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference21 articles.

1. Areeda, P. (1990), Essential Facilities: An Epithet in need of Limiting Principles, Antitrust Law Journal, 58.

2. Boscheck, R. (2000), EU Policy Reform on Vertical Restraints – An Economic Perspective, World Competition: Law & Economics Review, 23(4), 3-49.

3. CompassLexecon (2021), The Digital Market Act, https://www.compasslexecon.com/insights/publications/the-proposed-dma-back-to-the-form-based-future.

4. Condorelli, D. and J. Padilla (2020), Harnessing Platform Envelopment in the Digital World, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 16(2), 143-187.

5. Elhauge, E. (2003), Defining Better Monopolization Standards, Stanford Law Review, 56, 253-286.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3