Examining Traits of Engagement in Solidarity Actions in Romania: An Analysis of Findings from Social Values Studies with a Comparative Emphasis

Author:

Rusu Horațiu1,Bejenaru Anca1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu , Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities ,, 2A, Lucian Blaga Street, 550169 , Sibiu , Romania

Abstract

Abstract Social solidarity is increasingly under scrutiny in the contemporary world. Modern phenomena such as individualization, globalization, and migration have sparked inquiries into the dynamics and transformations of solidarity. Within this context, our study seeks to address one dimension of solidarity: the actions that embody it. We embark on a two-fold mission. On the one hand, we delve into the characteristics of the people engaging in solidarity actions. On the other hand, we compare results regarding acts of solidarity in Romania across different time frames. Our analysis mainly draws from the data collected through the European Values Survey in 2018. Comparisons are made with results from previous analyses and data from the 2012 World Values Survey. To accomplish these ends, we rely on both descriptive and multivariate analyses. Results suggest that approximately two-thirds of Romanians engage in solidarity actions. The likelihood of involving in solidarity actions is mainly influenced by age, religious behaviour, individualization, membership in associations, and recent volunteering behaviour.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Abela, Anthony M. 2004. “Solidarity and Religion in the European Union: A Comparative Sociological Perspective”. In The Value(s) of a Constitution for Europe, edited by Peter G. Xuereb, 71–101.

2. Arnsperger, Christian, and Yanis Varoufakis. 2003. “Toward a Theory of Solidarity”. Erkenntnis (1975-) 59 (2): 157–88.

3. Arts, Wil, and John Gelissen. 2001. “Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?” Acta Sociologica 44 (4): 283–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930104400401.

4. Arts, Wilhelmus Antonius, Loek Halman, and Wim van Oorschot. 2003. “The Welfare State: Villain or Hero of the Piece?” In The Cultural Diversity of European Unity, edited by Wilhelmus Antonius Arts, Jacques Hagenaars, and Loek Halman, 275–310. Leiden: Brill.

5. Banting, Keith, Richard Johnston Johnston, Will Kymlicka, and Stuart Soroka. 2011. “Are Diversity and Solidarity Incompatible? Canada in Comparative Context”. Inroads: The Canadian Journal of Opinion, no. 28: 36–48.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3