Affiliation:
1. City Hall in Zabrze, Silesian University of Technology
Abstract
Abstract
Surveys performed among the residents of Zabrze indicate that in 2021 the majority of respondents (67%), wishing to use public services provided by the local government, still preferred to visit the office in person. Residents noticed negative aspects of direct service, such as queues of people waiting for the case to be completed (26%), excessive bureaucracy (24%) or lack of parking spaces (18%). However, they counted on help in completing the necessary formalities by officials who should be: professional (20%), communicative (18%) and kind (17%). The use of the digital platform (ePUAP) dedicated to customer service was reported by 32% of respondents. At the same time, as much as 40% of the respondents, in order to save time and to simplify procedures, declared their will to use innovative methods of remote contact with public administration (e.g. via social media). The COVID-19 pandemic showed that it was possible to increase (even by 250%) the number of cases handled remotely, which with over 90% of households in Poland with access to a computer network creates opportunities for integrated development as part of the Smart City idea. The aim of the paper was to identify the residents’ expectations related to the provision of public services by local administration. Precise determination of the ways of perception of both direct and remote customer service has not only an application value. It also allows for further research study on the management of local government, including the organization of management control, as well as social communication of local governments.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Management Information Systems
Reference37 articles.
1. [1] A. Kuzior, B. Sobotka, The role of social capital in the development of smart cities. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 134, 2019. pp. 109-11910.29119/1641-3466.2019.134.9
2. [2] A.E. Oke, S.S. Stephen, C.O. Aigbavboa, D.R. Ogunsemi and I.O. Aje, The Smart City Process, Smart Cities: A Panacea for Sustainable Development, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 2022. pp. 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80382-455-020221004.10.1108/978-1-80382-455-020221004
3. [3] Ustawa z dnia 8 marca 1990 roku o samorządzie gminnym (Dz. U. z 1990 roku, nr 16, poz. 95).
4. [4] Wykorzystanie technologii informacyjno-komunikacyjnych w jednostkach administracji publicznej, przedsiębiorstwach i gospodarstwach domowych w 2020 roku, Raport Głównego Urzędu Statystycznego opublikowany 25 maja 2021 r. https://stat.gov.pl [accessed: 20 January 2022].
5. [5] M. Czupich, M. Kola-Bezka and A. Ignasiak-Szulc. Czynniki i bariery wdrażania koncepcji Smart City w Polsce, Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 276, 2016. pp. 223-235.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献