Affiliation:
1. University of Technology
Abstract
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a commonly used additive manufacturing (AM) technique in both domestic and industrial end-product fabrications. It produces prototypes and parts with complex geometric designs, which has the major benefits of eliminating the need for expensive tooling and flexibility. However, the produced parts often face poor part strength due to anisotropic fabrication strategies. The printing procedure, the kind of material utilized, and the printing parameters all have a significant impact on the mechanical characteristics of the printed item. In order to predict the mechanical properties related to printed components made with the use of FDM and Polylactic Acid (PLA) material, this study concentrates on developing a prediction model utilizing Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). This study used the Taguchi design of experiments technique, utilizing (L25) orthogonal array as well as a Neural Network (NN) method with two layers and 15 neurons. The effect of FDM parameters (layer thickness (mm), percentage of infill density, number of top/bottom layers, shell thickness (mm), and infill overlap percentage) on ultimate tensile and compressive strength (UTS and UCS) was examined through analysis of variance (ANOVA). With an ANOVA result of 67.183% and 40.198%, respectively, infill density percentage was found to be the most significant factor influencing UCS and UTS dependent on other parameters. The predicted results demonstrated valuable agreement with experimental values, with mean squared errors of (0.098) and (0.326) for UTS and UCS, respectively. The predictive model produces flexibility in selecting the optimal setting based on applications.
Reference29 articles.
1. S. Fafenrot, N. Grimmelsmann, M. Wortmann, and A. Ehrmann, “Three-dimensional (3D) printing of polymer-metal hybrid materials by fused deposition modeling,” Materials, vol. 10, 2017, pp. 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10101199
2. S. M. Ahmad and S. Y. Ezdeen, “Effect of coating on the specific properties and damping loss parameter of ultem 1010,” Zanco J. Pure Appl, Sci., vol. 33, 2021, pp. 105-116. https://doi.org/10.21271/ZJPAS.33.2.10
3. T. Abbas, F. M. Othman, and H. B. Ali, “Effect of infill Parameter on compression property in FDM Process,” Dimensions, vol. 12, 2017, pp. 24-25. https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0710021619
4. F. A. Naser and M. T. Rashid, “The Influence of Concave Pectoral Fin Morphology in the Performance of Labriform Swimming Robot,” Iraqi J. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 16, 2020, pp. 54-61. https://doi.org/10.37917/ijeee.16.1.7
5. A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, S.S. Mahapatra, “Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modeling processed part using grey Taguchi method,” Mater Des, vol. 30, no. 10, 2009, pp. 4243-4252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.030