Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil Engineering , Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology , Gorakhpur , India
Abstract
Abstract
The use of geosynthetic reinforcement to enhance the ultimate load-bearing capacity and reduce the anticipated settlement of the shallow foundation has gained sufficient attention in the geotechnical field. The improved performance of the shallow foundation is achieved by providing one or more layers of geosynthetics below the foundation. The full wraparound technique proved to be efficient for the confinement of soil mass and reduction in settlement of foundation however lacks the literature to ascertain the performances of such footing under dynamic loading. In view of the above, the present study examines the effect of geosynthetic layers having a finite length with full wraparound ends as a reinforcement layer, placed horizontally at a suitable depth below the foundation using the finite element modeling (FEM) and evaluates the ultimate load-bearing capacity of a strip footing resting on loose and dense coarse-grained earth beds under seismic loading and further compared to those of footing resting on unreinforced earth bed. Moreover, the effect of horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient (kh) on the ultimate load-bearing capacity has been investigated by varying kh from 0.1 to 0.6 at an interval of 0.1, for both reinforced and unreinforced earth bed having loose and dense soil strata. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that by adopting the new practice of using the geosynthetic reinforcement with the full wraparound ends in foundations, it is possible to support relatively heavier structures under static as well as dynamic loading without allowing large footing settlements. From the outcomes of the present study, it is noted that the ultimate load-bearing capacity of footing resting on loose and dense sand bed found to be improved by 60% and 18% for soils having friction angle of 25° and 40°, respectively compared to respective unreinforced earth beds under static condition.
Reference39 articles.
1. 1. Adams, MT and Collin, JG 1997. Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 123(1), 66-72.
2. 2. Akinmusuru, JO and Akinbolade, JA 1981. Stability of loaded footings on reinforced soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 107(6), 819-827.
3. 3. Aria, S, Shukla, SK and Mohyeddin, A 2017. Optimum burial depth of geosynthetic reinforcement within sand bed based on numerical investigation. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 14(1), 71-79.
4. 4. Badakhshan, E and Noorzad, A 2017. Effect of footing shape and load eccentricity on behavior of geosynthetic reinforced sand bed. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45(2), 58-67.
5. 5. Benmebarek, S, Djeridi, S, Benmebarek, N and Belounar, L 2018. Improvement of bearing capacity of strip footing on reinforced sand. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 12(6), 537-545.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献