Mineralogical and geochemical evidence for two-stage silicification of serpentinized peridotites from the Szklary Massif (NE Bohemian Massif)
Author:
Cieślik Błażej1ORCID, Kierczak Jakub1ORCID, Pietranik Anna1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. University of Wrocław , Institute of Geological Sciences , pl. Maksa Borna 9 , Wrocław , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Previously unknown exposures of silicified serpentinites have been documented within the Szklary Massif, which is a fragment of the tectonically dismembered Central Sudetic Ophiolite (NE Bohemian Massif). On the basis of textural, mineralogical and chemical differences, two types of silicified serpentinites have been distinguished in this study (Type I and Type II). Type I is characterized by well-preserved primary minerals cut by numerous veinlets filled with microscale euhedral quartz crystals. Studied samples of Type I are enriched in silica (from 62 to 69 wt.% SiO2) and depleted in magnesium (from 10 to 19 wt.% MgO) in comparison to serpentinized peridotites from the Szklary Massif. Type II is almost exclusively composed of amorphous or poorly crystalline silica, with microquartz aggregates being the most abundant form. Silicified serpentinites of Type II show extremely high values of silica (from 83 to 90 wt.% SiO2) and low magnesium concentrations (from 4 to 8 wt.% MgO). Both types of silicified serpentinites have elevated content of REE and many other trace elements generally regarded as incompatible. We infer that the earlier silicification event was caused by the percolation of Si-rich hydrothermal fluids derived from igneous rocks, which intruded this area from ca. 380 to 330 Ma. A subsequent silicification event is the result of silica remobilization during intense chemical weathering under tropical conditions, which could have occurred between Late Cretaceous and Miocene.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Geochemistry and Petrology
Reference54 articles.
1. Aftabi, A., & Zarrinkoub, M., H. (2013). Petrogeochemistry of listvenite association in metaophiolites of Sahlabad region, eastern Iran: Implications for possible epigenetic Cu–Au ore exploration in metaophiolites. Lithos, 156–159, 186–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.11.006.10.1016/j.lithos.2012.11.006 2. Aiglsperger, T., Proenza, J. A., Lewis, J. F., Labrador, M., Svojtka, M., Rojas-Purón, A., Longo, F., & Ďurišová, J. (2016). Critical metals (REE, Sc, PGE) in Ni laterites from Cuba and the Dominican Republic. Ore Geology Reviews, 73, 127–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.10.010.10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.10.010 3. Aleksandrowski, P., & Mazur, S. (2002). Collage tectonics in the northeasternmost part of the Variscan Belt: the Sudetes, Bohemian Massif. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 201(1), 237–277. DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.201.01.12.10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.201.01.12 4. Auclair, M., Gauthier, M., Trottier, J., Jebrak, M., & Chartrand, F. (1993). Mineralogy, geochemistry, and paragenesis of the Eastern Metals serpentinite-associated Ni-Cu- Zn deposit, Quebec Appalachians. Economic Geology, 88(1), 123–138. DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.88.1.123.10.2113/gsecongeo.88.1.123 5. Awdankiewicz, M., Kryza, R., Turniak, K., Ovtcharova, M., & Schaltegger, U. (2021). The Central Sudetic Ophiolite (European Variscan Belt): Precise U-Pb zircon dating and geotectonic implications. Geological Magazine, 158(3), 555–566. DOI: 10.1017/S0016756820000722.10.1017/S0016756820000722
|
|