Affiliation:
1. Département de Sociologie , Université de Genève , CH-1211 Genève 4
Abstract
Abstract
Based on the case of the Swiss disability insurance (DI), the article questions the impact of activation on the (non-)take-up of social policies. It investigates the aim and content of activation policies (as found in official texts and discourses) and their subjective perception among recipients. Inspired by Kerr’s model and Hobson’s notion of “sense of entitlement”, analysis reveals the paradoxical outcomes of DI reforms. It underlines the importance of the subjective dimension of entitlements in the sociological understanding of non-take-up.
Reference48 articles.
1. Anderson, Joel. 2009. Autonomy Gaps as a Social Pathology: Ideologiekritik Beyond Paternalism. Pp. 433–453 in Sozialphilosophie und Kritik, edited by Rainer Forst, Martin Hartmann, Rahel Jaeggi, and Martin Saar. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
2. Baumberg, Ben. 2016. The Stigma of Claiming Benefits: A Quantitative Study. Journal of Social Policy 45(2): 181–199.
3. Baumberg Geiger, Ben. 2017. Benefits Conditionality for Disabled People: Stylised Facts from a Review of International Evidence and Practice. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 25(2): 107–128.
4. Béal, Arnaud, Nikos Kalampalikis, Nicolas Fieulaine, and Valérie Haas. 2014. Expériences de justice et représentations sociales : l’exemple du non-recours aux droits. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 103(3): 549–573.
5. Berrat, Brigitte. 2014. Pourquoi en vient-on à renoncer à ses droits sociaux ? Le cas du non-recours aux droits et dispositifs liés au handicap. Les Politiques Sociales 3–4: 70–80.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献