Impact of reconfiguration on the flow downstream of a flexible foliated plant
Author:
Maio Marco1, Marini Gustavo1, Fontana Nicola1, Gualtieri Paola2, Caroppi Gerardo23
Affiliation:
1. University of Sannio , Department of Engineering , Piazza Roma 21 , , Benevento , Italy . 2. University of Naples Federico II , Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering , Via Claudio 21 , , Napoli , Italy . 3. Aalto University School of Engineering , Department of Built Environment , Tietotie 1E , , Espoo , Finland .
Abstract
Abstract
This paper explores the impacts of reconfiguration and leaf morphology on the flow downstream of a flexible foliated plant. 3D acoustic Doppler velocimetry and particle image velocimetry were used to experimentally investigate the hydrodynamic interaction between a foliated plant and the flow, testing two plants with different leaves morphology under different bulk flow velocities. The model vegetation was representative of riparian vegetation species in terms of plants hydrodynamic behavior and leaf to stem area ratio. To explore the effects of the seasonal variability of vegetation on the flow structure, leafless conditions were tested. Reconfiguration resulted in a decrease of the frontal projected area of the plants up to the 80% relative to the undeformed value. Such changes in plant frontal area markedly affected the spatial distributions of mean velocity and turbulence intensities, altering the local exchanges of momentum. At increasing reconfiguration, the different plant morphology influenced the mean and turbulent wake width. The leafless stem exhibited a rigid behavior, with the flow in the wake being comparable to that downstream of a rigid cylinder. The study revealed that the flexibility-induced reconfiguration of plants can markedly affect the local distribution of flow properties in the wake, potentially affecting transport processes at the scale of the plant and its subparts.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference61 articles.
1. Aberle, J., Järvelä, J., 2013. Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 51, 1, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.754795 2. Ackerman, J.D., Okubo, A., Okubot, A., 1993. Reduced Mixing in a Marine Macrophyte Canopy. Functional Ecology, 7, 3, 305–309.10.2307/2390209 3. Biggs, H.J., Nikora, V.I., Gibbins, C.N., Cameron, S.M., Papadopoulos, K., Stewart, M., Fraser, S., Vettori, D., Savio, M., O’Hare, M.T., Kucher, M., Hicks, D.M., 2019. Flow interactions with an aquatic macrophyte: a field study using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Journal of Ecohydraulics, 4, 2, 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2019.1606677 4. Boothroyd, R.J., Hardy, R.J., Warburton, J., Marjoribanks, T.I., 2017. Modeling complex flow structures and drag around a submerged plant of varied posture. Water Resources Research, 53, 4, 2877–2901. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020186 5. Bouma, T.J., van Duren, L.A., Temmerman, S., Claverie, T., Blanco-Garcia, A., Ysebaert, T., Herman, P.M.J., 2007. Spatial flow and sedimentation patterns within patches of epibenthic structures: Combining field, flume and modelling experiments. Continental Shelf Research, 27, 8, 1020–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2005.12.019
|
|