Affiliation:
1. National Autonomous University of Mexico
Abstract
Abstract
The current status of semiotics in society and the academic environment is rather marginal, and this is one of its many paradoxes (Gaines 2015). It is paradoxical because semiotics deals with all aspects of meaning; it is relevant to every field of inquiry (Posner et al. 2003) and is applicable to everyday experiences producing meaning. Yet, it is not an established field in most academic systems, and it lacks full recognition in the disciplinary ‘market’ (Rastier 2001). This paper discusses a particular aspect coming from a larger study carried out with 40 semiotics scholars in 12 countries in 3 languages (English, French and Spanish). I will focus on the construction and development of a prevailing discourse that intends to convey the practitioners’ own subjective experiences of living and working in a marginalised field.
Reference62 articles.
1. Angermuller, J., 2013. How to become an academic philosopher. Academic discourse as a multileveled positioning practice. Sociología Histórica, 2, 263–289.
2. Archer, L., 2008. Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity Studies in Higher Education 33(4): 385–403.10.1080/03075070802211729
3. Bamberg, M., 1997. Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 335–342.10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
4. Bamberg, M., 2004. Considering counter-narratives. In Bamberg, M., Andrews, M. (Eds.), Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense. Amsterdam: John Benjamins., pp. 351–371.10.1075/sin.4.43bam
5. Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D., 2011. Discourse and identity construction. In Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S., & Vignoles, V. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 177–199.10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献