Computerized Assessment of Integrated Site Risk Specific to Industrial Infrastructures of Explosives, Taking Acts of Maliciousness Into Consideration

Author:

Popa Narcis1,Darsy Anton2,Pintilie Dan3,Tudor Denisa4,Enache Carla5,Vasilescu Gabriel6

Affiliation:

1. 1 University of Petroșani , Petroșani , Romania

2. 2 University of Petroșani , Petroșani , Romania

3. 3 University of Petroșani , Petroșani , Romania

4. 4 University of Petroșani , Petroșani , Romania

5. 5 University of Petroșani , Petroșani , Romania

6. 6 National Institute for Research and Development in Mine Safety and Protection to Explosion INSEMEX Petroșani , Romania

Abstract

Abstract The general safety rules applicable to high-risk industrial sites are based on both the 4 principles of working safely with explosive substances (knowing the risks, separating the risks, limiting the risks and overlapping safety devices), as well as the specific characteristics of the general and particular reports of explosion safety, together with the technical aspects related to the possible causes of explosion, the effects of explosion and safety distances, the protection against accidental triggering of the explosion, as well as the security in the field of explosive powders and pyrotechnic systems highlighting the limits related to the principle of pyrotechnic safety (knowledge, prevention and limitation of pyrotechnic risk). The scientific article offers an original perspective of solving the problem in the field of explosion risk generated when explosive materials are involved, taking into account acts of ill-will, using the working facilities of some dedicated software for its analysis and evaluation, and the results obtained are expressed in a technical manner integrated within the specialized IT application TERRORISK.EXE 01.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. [1] Bauer I.A., Calder P., 1974 New orientations in explosives, perforations and blasting techniques - C.I.M. Bullettin 2/1974

2. [2] Salvi O., Jovanovic A., Bolvin C., Dupuis C., Vaquero C., Balos D., Villamizar A.M., 2008 F-Seveso. Study of effectiveness of the Seveso II Directive. Final report, http://www.fseveso.eu-vri.eu/

3. [3] Ozunu A., Anghel C., 2007 Evaluation of the technical risk in environment safety, Accent Publishing, Cluj-Napoca

4. [4] Major Accident Hazards Bureau (MAHB), 2006 Land Use Planning Guidelines in the context of Article 12 of the Seveso II Directive 96/82/EC as amended by Directive 105/2003/EC, Ed. M.D. Christou, M. Struckl, T. Biermann, European Commission, Joint Research Centre

5. [5] Aven T., 2008 Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities, Ed. Wiley, Great Britain

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3