Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Witten/Herdecke , Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50 , Witten , Germany
2. Department for Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Martinistreet 52 , Hamburg , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
In this study, we investigated the concept of empowerment in chronic wound care and propose to facilitate patient control by making use of degrees of freedom (DOF): that is, shaping of everyday wound care tasks initiated by patients and based on their wishes, mostly in terms of patients executing treatment steps, requesting or directing health care professionals to undertake changes, or modifications of internal states.
Methods
As a first step, we conducted a systematic literature search, followed by an inductive form of qualitative content analysis, which resulted in the identification of 5 dimensions as main elements of empowerment: education and shared decision making, adherence to self-care behaviors, responsibility and control, general call for empowerment, and DOF. However, the latter are noticeably absent in the literature. To investigate patients’ freedom in shaping the wound care process, we conducted a second literature search.
Results
A number of possibilities for patients to influence the wound care process could be identified, but experimental or clinical evidence about their effects is missing, their variety is limited, and they are only inadequately described.
Conclusions
However, DOF should be an indispensable aspect of genuine empowerment, since they allow patients to occupy the role of the agent in the treatment process and give rise to the subjective experience of feeling empowered. Thus, in the third part, we develop a research proposal on how to investigate and include DOF in the clinical practice of wound care. Finally, limitations about implementations are discussed (e.g., patients being reluctant to overcome their passive role, resulting in frustration for health care professionals).
Reference69 articles.
1. Garattini L, Padula A. Patient empowerment in Europe: is no further research needed? Eur J Health Econ. 2018;19:637–640.
2. Palumbo R. The bright side and the dark side of patient empowerment. Co-creation and co-destruction of value in the healthcare environment. SpringerBriefs in Public Health. Cham, CHE: Springer; 2017.
3. Pulvirenti M, McMillan J, Lawn S. Empowerment, patient centred care and self-management. Health Expect. 2011;17:303–310.
4. Trummer UF, Mueller UO, Nowak P, Stidl T, Pelikan JM. Does physician-patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome? A case study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:299–306.
5. Wounds International. International Best Practice Statement: Optimising patient involvement in wound management. January 4, 2016. https://www.woundsinternational.com/resources/details/international-best-practice-statement-optimising-patient-involvement-in-wound-management. Accessed January 24, 2023.