Affiliation:
1. 1 School of Intellectual Property , Nanjing University of Science and Technology , Nanjing , Jiangsu , , China
2. 2 Nanjing Audit University Jinshen College , Nanjing , Jiangsu , , China
Abstract
Abstract
This paper first defines the conceptual scope of intellectual property, and the intellectual property evaluation system analyzes the special characteristics of enterprise intellectual property evaluation and compares the differences between several intellectual property management models. Secondly, an open adaptive enterprise IPR evaluation system is constructed based on a linear regression model, and the system structure and the relationship between subsystems are analyzed in depth. Finally, based on the theory of adaptive evaluation management, the adaptive IPR evaluation system is constructed. The adaptive enterprise IPR evaluation model based on linear regression was constructed mainly from three dimensions, and the method to determine the development coordination index and early warning degree of the three dimensions was deduced. The results show that the average efficiency of the typical enterprise IPR evaluation system calculated based on the linear regression model is 0.86, which is 21.3% more efficient than the traditional model. Four of the decision units’ DEA is effective, 63% of the inputs are effective, and 37% of the input resources are wasted, which aligns with the actual enterprise. The adaptive IPR evaluation system based on the linear regression model proposed in this paper has theoretical innovation value and practical significance for enterprises to realize the transformation of IPR achievements.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation,General Computer Science
Reference18 articles.
1. Gaikwad, A. H. (2020). A Study of Intellectual Property Rights and Its Significance for Business. Journal of Computational Acoustics, 10(2), 552-561.
2. Leonid, Kogan, Dimitris, Papanikolaou, Amit, & Seru, et al. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth*. Quarterly Journal of Economics..
3. Mazzola, E., Acur, N., Piazza, M., et al. (2018). “To Own or Not to Own?” A Study on the Determinants and Consequences of Alternative Intellectual Property Rights Arrangements in Crowdsourcing for Innovation Contests. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
4. Xiang, W. (2015). China’s Intellectual Property Protection Strength and Its Evaluation - Based on the Accession to TRIPS Agreement (Agreement On Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). R & D Management: Research and Development Management.
5. Liu, X. (2021). Evaluation of Influencing Factors of Intellectual Property Protection Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2021(3), 1-10.