Affiliation:
1. Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning , Fryske Akademy , Netherlands
Abstract
Summary
The study presented here is the first contemporary investigation of the subjective compared to the objective ethnolinguistic vitality of West Frisian. West Frisian is a minority language spoken in the province of Fryslân, in the north of the Netherlands. The objective ethnolinguistic vitality of the language was established on the basis of policy documents and statistical data. To investigate the subjective ethnolinguistic vitality of the language, rich qualitative data were gathered by means of a questionnaire, which – due to low literacy rates – was administered to West Frisian speakers (N=15) in person. The primarily open-ended items in the questionnaire targeted different aspects of the three main socio-structural factors that constitute the ethnolinguistic vitality of a language: that is, status, demography, and institutional support. Content analysis was performed on the questionnaire data, using rounds of deductive and inductive coding and analysis. The results suggest that West Frisian has a certain amount of vitality, which constitutes a good basis for language planning to ensure its continued maintenance. Moreover, the findings indicate that overall, the subjective vitality tallies with the objective vitality in terms of status, demography, and institutional support. However, two aspects raised concern among the participants: firstly, as part of the status of West Frisian, there was concern about the language's presence in the linguistic landscape (where subjective vitality matched objective vitality, but participants explicitly expressed the desire for a more persistent and pervasive presence of the language in public spaces); and secondly, as part of the institutional support for West Frisian, there was concern about the role of the language in the education system (where subjective vitality did not match objective vitality). The article discusses what implications the findings of this exploratory study – should they hold true – would have for language planning in the province of Fryslân.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference30 articles.
1. Austin, P. K., & Sallabank, J. (2013). Endangered languages: An introduction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 34(4), 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.794806
2. Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and language. Multilingual Matters.
3. Beckett, C., & Clegg, S. (2007). Qualitative data from a postal questionnaire: questioning the presumption of the value of presence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(4), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557070701401214
4. Bootsma, C. (2016, October 28). Leuk, die Friezen, al blijft Opende Gronings [Nice, those Frisians, but Opende stays Gronings]. Dagblad van het Noorden.https://www.dvhn.nl/groningen/Leuk-die-Friezen-al-blijft-Opende-Gronings-21736341.html
5. Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H., & Rosenthal, D. (1981). Notes on the construction of a subjective vitality questionnaire for ethnolinguistic groups. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1981.9994047
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献