Affiliation:
1. Babeș-Bolyai University , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
Intelligence is the traditional element of interest when measuring the human cognitive abilities. However, intelligence is complex and researchers are constantly finding new angles of looking at it. One such angle is reflective reasoning. Sometimes individuals choose to override the intuitive answer and by engaging in further reflection they reach the correct answer. The cognitive reflection test (CRT) measures a person’s ability to suppress their incorrect intuitive answer in favor of reflection that should then lead to the correct response. The test contains three short mathematically based problems, which measure, among others, cognitive ability, mathematical abilities and cognitive reflection. Using a sample of 195 students from a state university, one of the largest universities in Romania, we explore the extent to which a variety of phenomena and trends identified by previous findings on CRT show similar results on our sample.
Reference42 articles.
1. Auld, M. C., Sidhu, N. (2005) Schooling, cognitive ability and health, Health Economics, 14(10), 1019–1034
2. Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., Metz, E. (2015) Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)?, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265–284
3. Benbow, C. P., Stanley, J. C. (1980) Sex Differences in Mathematical Ability: Fact or Artifact? Science, 210(12 December), 1978–1980
4. Brañas-Garza, P., Kujal, P., & Lenkei, B. (2015). Cognitive Reflection Test: Whom, how, when. Working Paper.
5. Campitelli, G., Gerrans, P. (2014) Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach, Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434–47
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献