The Rebellious Social Network Reaction to COVID-19

Author:

Cioban Ștefana1,Vîntoiu Dragoş1

Affiliation:

1. Masters in Complex Data Analysis, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work , Babeș-Bolyai University , Cluj-Napoca

Abstract

Abstract Gathering social media content and analysing the heavy and unstructured text coming from posts, comments and reactions can come as a powerful tool in understanding how people react to the information they receive. In this article we present the results from a social media analysis of 10771 headlines, with their subsequent text bodies and comments posted in a subreddit destined for Romanians during the state of emergency declared in Romania, from March 16 to May 15, 2020. Our objective was to model the main topics debated by this targeted population of people that tend to use Reddit to discuss current issues and to identify the sentiment polarity towards these topics. As expected, Romanians are mostly concerned with their social condition in the context of the pandemic caused by CoVID-19, as our research has revealed a word frequency for the term “Coronavirus” prominently higher than any other preferred term. However, the analysis brings up a surprising turnaround as the overall sentiment of the text posted in this dataset is predominantly neutral with a higher frequency of positive posts compared to the negative ones. This was unforeseen by our initial expectations: a natural tendency to more negative posts than positive considering the context of the chosen study period. Moreover, when compared to the time series of the CoVID-19 infections and caused deaths in Romania, spikes of extremely high or low mean sentiment scores per day can be correlated to the fluctuations of the declared cases. Not only does this bring us closer to understanding the social impact of CoVID-19 in the current context, but the outcome of this analysis can be easily extrapolated for further investigations upon other social networking tools or for more in-depth analysis on our studied corpus.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference41 articles.

1. Ampofo, L., Collister, S., O’Loughlin, B., & Chadwick, A. (2015). Text Mining and Social Media: when Quantitative Meets Qualitative and Software Meets People. In P. Halfpenny, R. Procter, P. Halfpenny, & R., Procter (Eds.), Innovations in Digital Research Methods (pp. 161-191). SAGE.10.4135/9781473920651.n8

2. Apishev, M., Koltcov, S., Koltsova, O., Nikolenko, S., & Vorontsov, K. (2016). Additive Regularization for Topic Modeling in Sociological Studies of User-Generated Texts. Advances in Computational Intelligence, 169-184. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62434-1_14.10.1007/978-3-319-62434-1_14

3. Borovikova, E. (2011, November 18). sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer. Retrieved May 31, 2020, from Scikit-learn: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer.html.

4. Cioban, Ș., & Vîntoiu, D. (2020, May 20). Covid19_sentiment_analysis. Retrieved from https://github.com/stefanacioban/covid19_sentiment_analysis.

5. Dawn Breslin, S., Enggaard, T., Blok, A., Gårdhus, T., & Pedersen, M. (2020, May 23). How We Tweet About Coronavirus, and Why: A Computational Anthropological Mapping of Political Attention on Danish Twitter during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Science, Medicine, and Anthropology. Retrieved June 7, 2020, from http://somatosphere.net/forumpost/covid19-danish-twitter-computational-map/.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3