Affiliation:
1. University of Ha’il , Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Summary
The earliest stages of pidgin formation show a preference for analytic and morphologically reduced grammatical constructions relative to their lexifier or substrate languages, where the apparent morphological marking, if found, seems to be fossilized. Structural relations, therefore, are mostly expressed externally. Tense/aspect categories are marked through temporal adverbials or inferred from the context. Creole languages, however, are said to develop such categories through grammaticalization. This study examines tense/aspect marking in five Arabic-based pidgins: Juba Arabic, Turku Pidgin, Pidgin Madame, Romanian Pidgin Arabic, and Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Using Siegel’s (2008) scale of morphological simplicity, from lexicality to grammaticality, this study concludes that tense/aspect marking is expressed lexically through temporal adverbials or inferred from the context in the earliest stages of Arabic-based pidgins, which only later—in stabilized pidgins—develops into grammaticalized markers when certain criteria are met.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference81 articles.
1. Aartun, K. (1963). Zur Frage altarabischer Tempora. Oslo Universitetsforlag.
2. Abd-el-Jawad, R. (1992). Is Arabic a pluricentric language? In M. Clyne (Ed.), Pluricentric languages (pp. 261–304). Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Al Wer, E. (2002). Education as a speaker variable. In A. Rouchdy (Ed.), Language contact and language conflict in Arabic: Variations on a sociolinguistic theme (pp. 41–53). Routledge Curzon.
4. Al-Azraqi, M. (2020). Pidginisation in Abha, Saudi Arabia: Pathways to multifunctionality. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 23(1), 37–61.
5. Alghamdi, E. (2014). Gulf Pidgin Arabic: A descriptive and statistical analysis of stability. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(6), 110–127.