The “Aum Incident” as a Catalyst for Societal Critique: An Analysis of Letters to the Editor of Asahi Shinbun on Aum Shinrikyō

Author:

Mayer Patricia SophieORCID

Abstract

Abstract This article analyses the discussion of Aum Shinrikyō in letters to the editor of one of the major Japanese newspapers, Asahi Shinbun, through the method of qualitative content analysis. The examination focuses on two aspects of the letters in order to uncover how Aum is understood and localised in a bigger context: first, how Aum itself is discussed, and second, what topics are brought up in relation to the group. The analysis reveals that Aum was rarely referred to as a cult or a false religion, but more often merely as a religion, which is subsequently associated with negative notions. The majority of letters, however, did not specify the nature of Aum at all. This is congruent with the topics covered in the letters, since the content of a large portion of them is not concerned with Aum directly but with a more abstract critique of society and authorities. Letters to the editor of Asahi Shinbun for a large part do not make use of sensationalist wording, all the while expressing a critical stance towards the movement, and additionally they focus on a critique of the dealings with Aum prior to and after the subway attack in 1995.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference43 articles.

1. Astley, Trevor. 2006. “New Religions.” In Paul L. Swanson and Clark Chilson, eds., Nanzan Guide to Japanese Religions. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, pp. 91–114.

2. Baffelli, Erica. 2016. Media and New Religions in Japan. New York: Routledge.

3. Baffelli, Erica. 2018. “Aum Shinrikyō.” In Lukas Pokorny and Franz Winter, eds., Handbook of East Asian New Religious Movements. Leiden and Boston: Brill, pp. 193–210.

4. Barker, Eileen. 1995. “The Scientific Study of Religion? You Must Be Joking!” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34 (3), pp. 287–310.

5. Barker, Eileen. 2011. “The Cult as a Social Problem.” In Titus Hjelm, ed., Religion and Social Problems. New York: Routledge, pp. 198–212.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3