Privatisation in East Asia: Comparison of Causes, Processes and Results-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Privatisation in East Asia: Comparison of Causes, Processes and Results

Published:2013-06-01 Issue:1 Volume:4 Page:97-122
ISSN:2521-7038
Container-title:Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mustonen Jani Juhani

Abstract

Abstract Causes of privatisation examined in this paper include the level of economic development, business cycles, fiscal constraints, national debt and external influences. Privatisation can be centralised, decentralised, rapid or gradual or it can be conducted through a privatisation programme or in an improvised, ad hoc manner. The most common privatisation methods include share issue privatisation, direct sale, leasing and privatisation from below. The outcomes of privatisation are viewed in the light of privatisation proceeds and profitability.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/vjeas-2013-0005

Reference94 articles.

1. Ahn, Byong-man, and In Chul Kim. “Reforming Public Enterprises in South Korea.” In International Review of Public Administration, 5/2, 2002, pp. 67-80

2. American Chamber of Commerce in Japan, Privatization Task Force. “Applying Global Best Practices to Privatization in Japan.” http://www.accj.or.jp/doclib/advocacy/PTFgeneralE.pdf, accessed August 2011

3. Asian Development Bank. “Special Evaluation Study on the Privatization of Public Sector Enterprises: Lessons for Developing Member Countries.” 2001, http://www.adb.org/documents/privatization-public-sector-enterprises-lessons-developing-member-countries, accessed December 2011

4. ASOSAI (Asian Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions). “Accountability and Control of Public Enterprise.” 1998, http://www.raa.gov.bt/contents/whats-new/accountability.php, accessed October 2011

5. Bortolotti, Bernardo, and Paolo Pinotti. “Political Economy of Privatization.” Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Working Paper No. 45, 2003.