Affiliation:
1. O.P. Jindal Global University , India
2. Associate at an Indian Law Firm
Abstract
Summary
Although Asia houses over 50 percent of world’s population, it is under-represented in the ICC. This underrepresentation is due to rationales both legal and political in nature. While the Asian nations do lack enthusiasm towards ratifying the Rome Statute, there could be tangible benefits to becoming a part of the ICC. This could help in the ongoing development of international law in Asia as well as greater recognition of human rights, international justice and accountability, thus, further emphasizing the importance of the rule of law in the continent. The benefits of ratifying the Rome Statute outweigh any disadvantages, real or perceived, and thus, domestic steps need to be undertaken to lead to eventual ratification. This paper will trace the histories of International Criminal Law and analyse the Asian participation in its discourse while further exploring the reasons for the disinclination of the Asian nations to join the ICC.
Reference81 articles.
1. ANGHIE, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 310–318.10.1017/CBO9780511614262
2. ARAI, Kyo. Japan’s Accession to the ICC Statute and the ICC Cooperation Law. Japanese Yearbook of International Law, 2008, vol. 51, pp. 365.
3. Art. 341–343, Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Penal Code, No. 15/1999/QH10.
4. Assembly of States Parties, Report of the Committee on Budget and Finance on the Work of Its Twenty-Seventh Session, ICC-ASP/15/15, 28th October 2016, 36–67.
5. BANERJEE, Rishav. Rome Statute and India: An Analysis of India’s Attitude towards the International Criminal Court. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 45910.14330/jeail.2011.4.2.10