Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Impact of Implementing an Integrated Territorial Approach for Regional Development

Author:

Stoyanova Mariela1

Affiliation:

1. 1 Tsenov Academy of Economics – Svishtov , Bulgaria

Abstract

Abstract The Cohesion policy of the European Union is the basis of the principle concept of functioning in the Community. In this regard, achieving its main goals is of particular importance. In the context of overcoming the main weaknesses before achieving cohesion goals in the Community, the new paradigm of regional development based on integrated and strategic development initiatives and clearly defined competitiveness factors is becoming increasingly popular. The new approach is oriented towards compensatory actions in narrowly defined and nationally significant areas to discover and use the potential of the regions to achieve the “critical mass” necessary for further development. It is for this reason that the new approach for integrated regional development was already adopted in the previous planning period 2014-2020 in the majority of member states. This article aims to define the conceptual framework for assessing the impact of integrated territorial investments. The methods used are content analysis of documents and GAP analysis, following standard inductive and deductive logical connections. As a result, some key challenges to implementing the integrated territorial approach in Bulgaria have been outlined. The structure of the publication contains a literature review on the topic, a methodological justification of the tools used, and a presentation of the main results and discussion questions.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference13 articles.

1. Barca, F., 2009. An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy, A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectation. Independent Report for DGRegio, Brussels: European Comission.

2. Camagni, R., Capello, R. & Caragliu,, A., 2019. Measuring the impact of legal and administrative international barriers on regional growth. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2(11), pp. 345-366, https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12195

3. Churski, P., Kociuba, D., Ochojski, A. & Polko, A., 2017. Towards policy–place-based policy and smart specialisation. Palgrave Macmillan. Springer, pp. 267-380, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51505-2_5

4. European Commission and European Investment Bank, 2013. Methodologies for Assessing Social and Economic Performance in JESSICA. Final Report: European Commission and European Investment Bank.

5. European Commission, 2015. Guidance document on Evaluation Plans. Terms of Reference for Impact Evaluations. Guidance on Quality Management of External Evaluation: European Commission.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3