Affiliation:
1. Boise State University , Boise, Idaho , USA
2. Texas Tech University , Lubbock , Texas , USA
Abstract
Abstract
The Covid-19 Pandemic and policy response rattled the US Treasury markets. Conventional US Treasuries, inflation adjusted US Treasuries, and the relationship between the two developed in ways such that ignoring changes in real interest rates yielded distorted inflation expectations estimates. Since the beginning of the pandemic, monetary policy kept nominal rates low and close to zero, but positive. Real rates, on the other hand, became increasingly negative. The relationship between the two market rates became negatively correlated, and distorted because of the fourth round of quantitative easing, along with the Fed preventing nominal yields from turning negative. Federal Reserve actions during the Covid-19 pandemic drove a larger wedge between nominal interest rates and real interest rates in the inflation adjusted market.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference13 articles.
1. Campbell, J. Y., Shiller, R. J., & Viceira, L. M. (2009). Understanding inflation-indexed bond markets (No. w15014). National Bureau of Economic Research.
2. Campbell, J. Y., Sunderam, A., & Viceira, L. M. (2009). Inflation bets or deflation hedges? The changing risks of nominal bonds (No. w14701). National Bureau of Economic Research.
3. Christensen, J., & Gillan, J. (2011). TIPS liquidity, breakeven inflation, and inflation expectations. FRBSF Economic Letter, 19, 1-5.
4. Christensen, J. H., Lopez, J. A., & Rudebusch, G. D. (2010). Inflation expectations and risk premiums in an arbitrage‐free model of nominal and real bond yields. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42, 143-178.
5. Christensen, J. H., & Rudebusch, G. D. (2012). The response of interest rates to US and UK quantitative easing. The Economic Journal, 122(564), F385-F414.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献