Gender Beliefs Measurement. How a Slightly Different Wording of the Same Question Changes the Story

Author:

Constantin Andreea1

Affiliation:

1. 1University of Cologne, GK SOCLIFE, 2 Richard Strauss Str., Room 3.A01, 50931 Cologne, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Slightly different wordings are known to introduce important differences in the way people understand and answer survey questions and, moreover, in the quality of the items (Billiet 1991). This is what may happen also in the case of two wordings used to measure the attitude people express towards the effect of the women’s job on their children. The aim of this study is to assess which of the two almost similar items, assumed to tap this kind of attitudes, produces a better measurement in terms of validity, reliability and overall quality. For this purpose I employ original data and use OLS models as well as SQP analysis. The findings reveal some surprising differences between the two items. This study starts with a short introduction, followed by the description of the method and the presentation of the findings. A short discussion concludes the text, focusing on implications for future studies.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference28 articles.

1. The Work - Care Balance : Is it Possible to Identify Typologies for Cross - National Comparisons;Haas;Current Sociology,2005

2. Ambivalent Attitudes Contradictory Institutions : Ambivalence in Gender - Role Attitudes in Comparative Perspective;Sjöberg;International Journal of Comparative Sociology,2010

3. Irmtraud Gallhofer and Tom Final report about the project as part of ESS Infrastructure Working No Barcelona Research Expertise Centre for Survey Methodology;Saris,2011

4. The Work - Care Balance : Is it Possible to Identify Typologies for Cross - National Comparisons;Haas;Current Sociology,2005

5. Ambivalent Attitudes Contradictory Institutions : Ambivalence in Gender - Role Attitudes in Comparative Perspective;Sjöberg;International Journal of Comparative Sociology,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3