Soil drought stress and high-temperature effects on photosystem II in different juvenile spruce provenances
Author:
Jamnická Gabriela1, Húdoková Hana1, Fleischer Peter23, Ježík Marek1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences , Ľ. Štúra 2 , Zvolen , Slovak Republic 2. Technical University in Zvolen , Faculty of Forestry , , SK-96001 Zvolen , Slovak Republic 3. Administration of Tatra National Park , Tatranská Lomnica , Vysoké Tatry , Slovak Republic
Abstract
Abstract
With prolonged periods of drought and temperature extremes becoming more frequent, the stress on Norway spruce has increased, as its ecological optimum is in colder and more humid environments. However, it is a tree species with a good adaptability, due to its great geographic and intraspecific variability. In this study, we tested the sensitivity of chlorophyll a fluorescence tools for the early detection of drought and heat stress, as well as their combined effect, in four Slovak Carpathian provenances, under controlled laboratory conditions. Responses in photosynthetic parameters of fast and slow (light response curves) kinetics of chlorophyll a fluorescence were analysed in spruce seedlings under four treatments: control, drought, heat, and combined drought + heat. Heat and drought + heat stresses led to the decrease of photosynthetic efficiency to a greater extent than in the case of only individual drought stress. The less sensitive parameter impacted by the stresses was the maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm), while the more sensitive parameters were: the performance index based on absorption of light energy (PIABS), the effective quantum yield of the PSII (ΦPSII), and the coefficients of non-photochemical fluorescence quenching (NPQ, qN). The significant variability in responses of individual provenances was also observed. Seedlings from two studied provenances responded better to these abiotic stresses (Pa-680 and Pa-1500); however, Pa-1500 provenance from the highest altitude showed the best ability of resistance to soil drought stress, as well as to high temperature effect. This rapid screening of photosystems II efficiency showed the importance of the selection of more resistant populations to concurrent stresses as one of the measures to mitigate climate change impacts.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference57 articles.
1. Aitken, S. N., Yeaman, S., Holliday, J. A., Wang, T., Curtis-McLane, S., 2008: Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications, 1:95–111. 2. Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M. et al., 2010: A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 259:660–684. 3. Baker, N. R., 2008: Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59:89–113. 4. Berry J., Björkman, O., 1980: Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 31:491–543. 5. Bigras, F. J., 2000: Selection of white spruce families in the context of climate change: heat tolerance. Tree Physiology, 20:1227–1234.
|
|