Trade-offs or complementarity between biomass production and biodiversity in European forests: a review
Author:
Rybar Jergus12, Bosela Michal12
Affiliation:
1. Technical University in Zvolen, Faculty of Forestry , T. G. Masaryka 24 , Zvolen , Slovak Republic 2. National Forest Centre , T. G. Masaryka 22 , Zvolen , Slovak Republic
Abstract
Abstract
Forestry faces the challenge of balancing the increasing demand for timber, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity protection. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in the stability and adaptability of forest ecosystems, enabling them to withstand disturbances and recover from them. Preserving biodiversity is essential for long-term survival and well-being. Enhancing biodiversity in managed forests is important because they occupy a significant area of forests in Europe. Understanding the relationships between forest production and biodiversity from various perspectives is crucial for developing effective multi-taxa management concepts. Biodiversity loss due to management practices can result in habitat destruction, fragmentation, and species displacement. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem services linked to biomass production, such as pollination, nutrient cycling, and carbon sequestration. This study reviews the relationships between biodiversity and production in Europen forests, emphasising the impacts of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and production, as well as the effects of production indicators on biodiversity. The effects of biodiversity on productivity are often studied in the same population, most often in the tree layer. However, a lack of knowledge on how biomass production affects the diversity of other ecosystem components limits our understanding of the multifacet relationships. Forest management significantly impacts biodiversity and production, and different management systems have varying effects on forest ecosystems. Diverse ecosystems exhibit niche complementarity, resulting in increased biomass production. Sustainable practices, including land-use planning, habitat protection, agroforestry, and non-invasive species use, can mitigate the adverse effects of biomass production on biodiversity.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference135 articles.
1. Adler, P. B., Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T., Hillebrand, H., Hautier, Y., Hector, A. et al., 2011: Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science, 333:1750–1753. 2. Aggestam, F., Konczal, A., Sotirov, M., Wallin, I., Paillet, Y., Spinelli, R. et al., 2020: Can nature conservation and wood production be reconciled in managed forests? A review of driving factors for integrated forest management in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 268:110670. 3. Ampoorter, E., Barbaro, L., Jactel, H., Baeten, L., Boberg, J., Carnol, M. et al., 2020: Tree diversity is key for promoting the diversity and abundance of forest-associated taxa in Europe. Oikos, 129:133–146. 4. Angelstam, P. K., 1998: Maintaining and restoring bio-diversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9:593–602. 5. Aragón, G., Abuja, L., Belinchón, R., Martínez, I., 2015: Edge type determines the intensity of forest edge effect on epiphytic communities. European Journal of Forest Research, 134:443–451.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|