Importance of Teachers’ Beliefs in Development of Scientific Literacy

Author:

Kotuľáková Katarína1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry , Trnava University , Priemyselná 4, P.O.BOX 9, 918 43 Trnava , Slovakia

Abstract

Abstract Science teachers communicate curricula goals to their students, prepare teaching situations and lead their students through them in order to learn science. The purpose of this study was to identify the beliefs of teachers about teaching and learning, specifically, what the teachers focus on, how they comprehend knowledge and their role in the process of learning since they can promote or hold back development of scientific literacy. Q methodology was used to investigate the beliefs of 65 science teachers by having them rank and sort a series of 51 statements. Factor analysis was used to identify identical patterns. The analysis showed that the teachers held four types of dominant beliefs about the effectiveness of science instruction and some common feature which have potential to influence educational process. Teachers concentrate on covering the content even if they declare the importance of personal construction, feel responsible for students’ learning and its outcomes. Despite stressing the activity of the students, the teachers did not emphasize particular science process skills and scaffolding process. The findings of the study suggest that systematic trainings focused on the nature of science and the scaffolding process would be beneficial for teachers in all identified factors.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Ecology,Education,Environmental Chemistry,Environmental Engineering

Reference50 articles.

1. [l] AC. Available from: https://australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10curriculum/science/?strand=Science+Understanding&strand=Science+as+a+Human+Endeavour&strand=Science+Inquiry+Skills&capability=ignore&priority=ignore&elaborations=true.

2. [2] National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. 2015. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmesofstudy/nationalcurriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study.

3. [3] NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. ISBN: 9780309272278.

4. [4] SVP. 2015. Available from: http://www.statpedu.sk/sk/svp/inovovany-statny-vzdelavaci-program/.

5. [5] Artayasa IP, Susilo H, Lestari U, Indriwati SE. The effectiveness of the three levels of inquiry in improving teacher training students’ science process skills. J Balt Sci Educat. 2017;16:908-18. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol16/908-918.Artayasa_JBSE_Vol.16_No.6.pdf.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3