Does Technical and Democratic Governance Have the Potential to Enhance Health Spending Allocations?
Author:
Vătavu Sorana1, Țăran Alexandra-Mădălina2, Moldovan Nicoleta-Claudia1, Lobonţ Oana-Ramona1
Affiliation:
1. West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration , Finance Department , Timisoara , Romania 2. West University of Timisoara , Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration , Timisoara , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
Nowadays, the medical systems of the EU Member States have a need for more efficient public policies and strategies to integrate the new societal challenges, the fragile economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, and sustain the development of health systems. This research explores the relationship between public governance and health expenditures allocation, under the theory of welfare economics and the concern for economic development. The research approaches both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The first refers to bibliometric analysis and review of the existing literature, followed by data mapping process to rank the EU countries based on the variables employed. The quantitative approach also includes advanced empirical analyses (principal component analysis - PCA and regression analysis) performed over the period 2007-2020. Two indices were created through PCA, technical governance and democratic governance, gathering the effects from different world governance indicators. The main results reveal that both governance indices have a direct influence on health expenditures per capita, while GDP growth, applied as a control variable, negatively influences health expenditures. Our results emphasise a need to redesign the public governance of health systems in terms of health spending allocations and increase investments in healthcare to support economic growth in the long run.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Social Psychology
Reference40 articles.
1. Amin, M., MacLachlan, M., Mannan, H., El Tayeb, S., El Khatim, A., Swartz, L., Munthali, A., Gert Van, R., McVeigh, J., Schenider, M., (2011), EquiFrame: a framework for analysis of the inclusion of human rights and vulnerable groups in health policies, Health and Human Rights, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–20. 2. Aubrecht, P., Essink, J., Kovac, M., Vandenberghe, A. S., (2020), Centralized and Decentralized Responses to COVID-19 in Federal Systems: US and EU Comparisons, SSRN Electronic Journal.10.2139/ssrn.3584182 3. Coccia, M., (2020), How (Un)sustainable Environments Are Related to the Diffusion of COVID-19: The Relation between Coronavirus Disease 2019, Air Pollution, Wind Resource and Energy. Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 22, p. 9709.10.3390/su12229709 4. Costea, F., Taran, A.-M., Lobont, O.-R., (2022), Scientific Contextualization of the Public Policy and Entrepreneurship Nexus, “Ovidius” University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 844-853. 5. Cristea, M., Noja, G.-G., Jurcuţ, C.-N., Ponea, C.-Ş., Caragiani, E.-S., Istodor, A.-V., (2021), The Interplay between Public Health, Well-Being and Population Aging in Europe: An Advanced Structural Equation Modelling and Gaussian Network Approach, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 4.10.3390/ijerph18042015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|