Socio-Ethical and Behavioural Aspects of Exoskeleton Implementation in Specific Military Missions

Author:

Talmațchi Maria-Lucia1,Virca Ioan1,Giurgiu Ioan-Tiberiu1,Popa Ioan-Dan1

Affiliation:

1. “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy , Sibiu , Romania

Abstract

Abstract The article explores different socio-ethical and behavioural aspects on the implementation of exoskeleton systems, providing an overview of current debates in this rapidly developing field. It examines the benefits and risks of implementing exoskeleton systems in specific military missions by improving soldiers' physical performance and endurance, reducing the risk of injury, and increasing operational effectiveness. Alongside these positive aspects, the socio-ethical and behavioural implications of the use of these technologies are also considered, with concerns relating to morality and accountability. The research presents a literature-based assessment of the impact these technologies may have on the psychology and behaviour of military personnel, including their sense of autonomy and control. In order to achieve the proposed objectives, a careful analysis of these socio-ethical and behavioural issues will be conducted and measures will be developed to minimize the risks of integrating exoskeleton systems into military missions through deployment strategies and regulatory frameworks that maximize the benefits of exoskeleton systems while reducing the risks and negative impacts on individuals and society as a whole.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference12 articles.

1. Bennett, C.J., & Raab, Ch. (2006). The Governance of Privacy: Policy Instruments in Global Perspective. 2nd Edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

2. Bertolini, A., & Giuseppe, A. (2018). Robot Companions: A Legal and Ethical Analysis. Information Society, Vol. 34, Issue 3, 130-140.

3. Ciria, A., Schillaci, G., Pezzulo, G., Hafner, V.V., & Lara, B. (2021). Predictive Processing in Cognitive Robotics: A Review. Neural Comput. Vol. 13, Issue 33, Issue 5, 1402-1432. Doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01383. PMID: 34496394.

4. Farris, D.J., et al. (2023). A systematic literature review of evidence for the use of assistive exoskeletons in defence and security use cases. Ergonomics, Vol. 66, Issue 1, 61-87. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2059106.

5. EU Parliament. (2016). Draft Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). January 27, 2017. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.html, accessed on March 06, 2024.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3