Affiliation:
1. Law School, The University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia
Abstract
Abstract
Arguments have been made both for and against military use of autonomous weapon systems (AWSs) on the basis of how they will help or hinder a state in meeting its international humanitarian law (IHL) obligations. Often, these arguments are made in isolation, or they fail to address all of the potential compliance concerns related to autonomous weapons. This is not ideal. It means the bearers of legal obligations must locate, assess and piece together the disparate arguments into a coherent structure if they are to know whether they can legitimately utilise a particular autonomous capability and, if so, in what circumstances. This article offers a high-level description of a conceptual framework which can be used to organise and assess legal arguments about autonomous weapons. It proposes that the task of integrating autonomous capabilities into an armed force may be viewed as a constrained optimisation problem wherein the task is to find the optimal balance between the fundamental principles of IHL while also satisfying all normative, technological and strategic/operational constraints.
Reference36 articles.
1. Australia’s System of Control and Applications for Autonomous Weapon Systems. (2019). Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems. CCW/GGE.1/2019/WP.2/Rev.1.
2. Bach, T. A., Khan, A., Hallock, H., Beltrão, G., & Sousa, S. (2022). A systematic literature review of user trust in AI-enabled systems: An HCI perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1-16. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2138826.
3. Beer, Y. (2016). Humanity considerations cannot reduce war’s hazards alone: Revitalizing the concept of military necessity. The European Journal of International Law, 26 (4), pp. 801-828.
4. Congressional Research Service. (2020). Emerging Military Technologies: Background and Issues for Congress. Available at https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R46458.pdf.
5. Declaration Renouncing the use, in Time of War, of Explosive Projectiles Under 400 Grammes Weight. (1868). [1901] ATS 125.