Epigeic spider and ground beetles (Carabid) communities of semi-natural and natural habitats in agricultural landscape in Slovakia
Author:
Langraf Vladimír1, Gajdoš Peter2, Purgat Pavol2, Štofík Jozef3, Šestáková Anna4, Petrovičová Kornélia5
Affiliation:
1. Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra , Faculty of Natural Sciences and Informatics , Nitra , Slovakia 2. Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Branch Nitra , Nitra , Slovakia 3. Administration of the Poloniny National Park in Stakčín , Stakčín , Slovakia 4. The Western Slovakian Museum , Múzejné nám. 3 , Trnava , Slovakia 5. Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra , Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources , Nitra , Slovakia
Abstract
Abstract
We studied the spatial structure of spiders and beetles in 4 types of habitats in the Poloniny National Park. Between the years 2020 and 2021, we recorded 1,597 beetle specimens and 3,765 spider specimens using the pitfall trap method. The most represented beetles were Poecilus versicolor (53.4%), Nebria brevicollis (10.3%), Staphylinus caesareus (4.4%) and Amara familiaris (4.1%). Among the spiders, there were species Pardosa pullata (21.81%), Pachygnatha degeeri (14.21%), Xerolycosa nemoralis (10.28%), Pardosa palustris (7.86%), Trochosa ruricola (6.24%) and Alopecosa pulverulenta (4.38%). We confirmed the occurrence of two European important species of beetles (Carabus zawadzkii, Carabus variolosus) and 3 species of spiders belonging to the vulnerable species according to the IUCN threat status (Gongylidiellum vivum, Palliduphantes milleri and Xysticus lineatus). We also found the spider Micaria micans, which is new to the Slovak fauna and information about its distribution and habitat preferences in Slovakia is presented. Using multivariate analyzes (CCA, RDA) and classification species into bioindicative groups, we found a greater connection of adaptable and eurytopic species of ground beetles to the mesophilic meadow and of spiders to the habitat Nardetum pasture. Based on bioindicative groups of species (adaptable, eurytopic and relict), we found only a small difference in percentile points between spiders and beetles.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference83 articles.
1. Alberti, M., Marzluf, J., Hunt, V.M., 2017. Urban driven phenotypic changes: Empirical observations and theoretical implications for eco-evolutionary feedback. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London, 372: 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0029 2. Baiamonte, G., Domina, G., Raimondo, F.M., Bazan, G., 2015. Agricultural landscapes and biodiversity conservation: a case study in Sicily (Italy). Biodiversity and Conservation, 24: 3201–3216. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-015-0950-4 3. Baranová, B., Fazekašová, D., Jászay, T., Manko, P., 2013. Ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) community of arable land with different crops. Folia Faunistica Slovaca, 18: 21–29. 4. Barton, P.S., Gibbk, H., Manningk, A., Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, S.A., 2011. Morphological traits as predictors of diet and microhabitat use in a diverse beetle assemblage. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102: 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13964 5. Batáry, P., Kurucz, K., Suarez-Rubio, M., Chamberlain, D.E., 2017. Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 24: 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13964
|
|